How good is the bipolar approximation of active regions for surface flux transport?
arXiv:2008.03203 · doi:10.1007/s11207-020-01688-y
Abstract
We investigate how representing active regions with bipolar magnetic regions (BMRs) affects the end-of-cycle polar field predicted by the surface flux transport model. Our study is based on a new database of BMRs derived from the SDO/HMI active region patch data between 2010 and 2020. An automated code is developed for fitting each active region patch with a BMR, matching both the magnetic flux and axial dipole moment of the region and removing repeat observations of the same region. By comparing the predicted evolution of each of the 1090 BMRs with the predicted evolution of their original active region patches, we show that the bipolar approximation leads to a 24% overestimate of the net axial dipole moment, given the same flow parameters. This is caused by neglecting the more complex multipolar and/or asymmetric magnetic structures of many of the real active regions, and may explain why previous flux transport models had to reduce BMR tilt angles to obtain realistic polar fields. Our BMR database and the Python code to extract it are freely available.
21 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in Solar Physics
References in corpus (13)
- The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: SHARPs -- Space-weather HMI Active Region Patches
- Advancements in the ADAPT Photospheric Flux Transport Model
- Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies
- Magnetic Flux Transport at the Solar Surface
- On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal and Surface Flux Transport During Solar Cycle 24
- Effects of the scatter in sunspot group tilt angles on the large-scale magnetic field at the solar surface
- The Effect of "Rogue" Active Regions on the Solar Cycle
- Source of a Prominent Poleward Surge During Solar Cycle 24
- The Solar Meridional Circulation and Sunspot Cycle Variability
- Improvement of solar cycle prediction: Plateau of solar axial dipole moment
- Parameter optimization for surface flux transport models
- Different contributions to space weather and space climate from different big solar active regions
- Optimization of surface flux transport models for the solar polar magnetic field
Cited by in corpus (17)
- Predicting Solar Flares Using CNN and LSTM on Two Solar Cycles of Active Region Data
- Surface Flux Transport on the Sun
- Physical Models for Solar Cycle Predictions
- Sunspot tilt angles revisited: Dependence on the solar cycle strength
- Torus-Stable Zone Above Starspots
- Comparison of physics-based prediction models of solar cycle 25
- Towards a live homogeneous database of solar active regions based on SOHO/MDI and SDO/HMI synoptic magnetograms. I. Automatic detection and calibration
- Impact of Anomalous Active Regions on the Large-scale Magnetic Field of the Sun
- Analysis of BMR tilt from AutoTAB catalog: Hinting towards the thin flux tube model?
- Toward a live homogeneous database of solar active regions based on SOHO/MDI and SDO/HMI synoptic magnetograms.II.parameters for solar cycle variability
- Surface Flux Transport Modeling using Physics Informed Neural Networks
- The relationship between bipolar magnetic regions and their sunspots
- Starspots as the origin of ultrafast drifting radio bursts from an active M dwarf
- Active regions and the large-scale magnetic field of solar cycle 24
- Testing solar surface flux transport models in the first days after active region emergence
- Prediction of the Solar Polar Fields in 2026: An Unusually Weak Level Across the Last Five Solar Cycles
- Ultra-fast simulations of the solar dipole and open flux