Parameter optimization for surface flux transport models
arXiv:1708.01098 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730689
Abstract
Accurate prediction of solar activity calls for precise calibration of solar cycle models. Consequently we aim to find optimal parameters for models which describe the physical processes on the solar surface, which in turn act as proxies for what occurs in the interior and provide source terms for coronal models. We use a genetic algorithm to optimize surface flux transport models using National Solar Observatory (NSO) magnetogram data for Solar Cycle 23. This is applied to both a 1D model that inserts new magnetic flux in the form of idealized bipolar magnetic regions, and also to a 2D model that assimilates specific shapes of real active regions. The genetic algorithm searches for parameter sets (meridional flow speed and profile, supergranular diffusivity, initial magnetic field, and radial decay time) that produce the best fit between observed and simulated butterfly diagrams, weighted by a latitude-dependent error structure which reflects uncertainty in observations. Due to the easily adaptable nature of the 2D model, the optimization process is repeated for Cycles 21, 22, and 24 in order to analyse cycle-to-cycle variation of the optimal solution. We find that the ranges and optimal solutions for the various regimes are in reasonable agreement with results from the literature, both theoretical and observational. The optimal meridional flow profiles for each regime are almost entirely within observational bounds determined by magnetic feature tracking, with the 2D model being able to accommodate the mean observed profile more successfully. Differences between models appear to be important in deciding values for the diffusive and decay terms. In like fashion, differences in the behaviours of different solar cycles lead to contrasts in parameters defining the meridional flow and initial field strength.
15 pages, 18 figures, to be published in A&A
References in corpus (30)
- Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle
- Predicting the Sun's Polar Magnetic Fields with a Surface Flux Transport Model
- Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction: Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies
- Solar Meridional Circulation from Doppler Shifts of the Fe I line at lambda 5250 Angstroms as Measured by the 150-foot Solar Tower Telescope at the Mt. Wilson Observatory
- Surface flux transport modeling for solar cycles 15--21: effects of cycle-dependent tilt angles of sunspot groups
- Stellar Structure Modeling using a Parallel Genetic Algorithm for Objective Global Optimization
- The cause of the weak solar cycle 24
- Modelling the Global Solar Corona: Filament Chirality Observations and Surface Simulations
- The effect of activity-related meridional flow modulation on the strength of the solar polar magnetic field
- Solar cycle 25: another moderate cycle?
- Are the strengths of solar cycles determined by converging flows towards the activity belts?
- Coronal Magnetic Field Evolution from 1996 to 2012: Continuous Non-Potential Simulations
- Effects of Meridional Flow Variations on Solar Cycles 23 and 24
- Meridional Flow in the Solar Convection Zone II: Helioseismic Inversions of GONG Data
- Long-Term Measurements of Sunspot Magnetic Tilt Angles
- The solar magnetic field since 1700: II. Physical reconstruction of total, polar and open flux
- Magnetic Quenching of Turbulent Diffusivity: Reconciling Mixing-length Theory Estimates with Kinematic Dynamo Models of the Solar Cycle
- Kinematic active region formation in a three-dimensional solar dynamo model
- A coupled D Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. II. Reference dynamo solutions
- A Non-potential Model for the Sun's Open Magnetic Flux
- Source of a Prominent Poleward Surge During Solar Cycle 24
- Helioseismic data inclusion in solar dynamo models
- The Solar Meridional Circulation and Sunspot Cycle Variability
- Chirality of High Latitude Filaments over Solar Cycle 23
- A coupled 22D Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. I. Surface magnetic flux evolution
- Evolution of active and polar photospheric magnetic fields during the rise of Cycle 24 compared to previous cycles
- The turbulent diffusion of toroidal magnetic flux as inferred from properties of the sunspot butterfly diagram
- Can surface flux transport account for the weak polar field in cycle 23?
- Surface flux transport simulations: Effect of inflows toward active regions and random velocities on the evolution of the Sun's large-scale magnetic field
- Physical Origin of Differences among various Measures of Solar Meridional Circulation
Cited by in corpus (19)
- Solar cycle prediction
- Surface Flux Transport on the Sun
- Evolution of solar and stellar dynamo theory
- Towards an algebraic method of solar cycle prediction I. Calculating the ultimate dipole contributions of individual active regions
- How many active regions are necessary to predict the solar dipole moment?
- How good is the bipolar approximation of active regions for surface flux transport?
- Active region contributions to the solar wind over multiple solar cycles
- Role of observable nonlinearities in solar cycle modulation
- Activity Complexes and A Prominent Poleward Surge During Solar Cycle 24
- Optimization of surface flux transport models for the solar polar magnetic field
- Effect of morphological asymmetry between leading and following sunspots on the prediction of solar cycle activity
- Two Classes of Eruptive Events During Solar Minimum
- The need for active region disconnection in 3D kinematic dynamo simulations
- Loss of toroidal magnetic flux by emergence of bipolar magnetic regions
- Toward a live homogeneous database of solar active regions based on SOHO/MDI and SDO/HMI synoptic magnetograms.II.parameters for solar cycle variability
- Active regions and the large-scale magnetic field of solar cycle 24
- Effect of Nonlinear Surface Inflows into Activity Belts on Solar Cycle Modulation
- Prediction of the Solar Polar Fields in 2026: An Unusually Weak Level Across the Last Five Solar Cycles
- Narrowing the solar surface flux transport parameter space through nonlinear feedbacks