Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students' problem solving performance?
arXiv:2006.15053 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010114
Abstract
Drawing appropriate diagrams is a useful problem solving heuristic that can transform a problem into a representation that is easier to exploit for solving it. One major focus while helping introductory physics students learn effective problem solving is to help them understand that drawing diagrams can facilitate problem solution. We conducted an investigation in which two different interventions were implemented during recitation quizzes in a large enrollment algebra-based introductory physics course. Students were either (i) asked to solve problems in which the diagrams were drawn for them or (ii) explicitly told to draw a diagram. A comparison group was not given any instruction regarding diagrams. We developed rubrics to score the problem solving performance of students in different intervention groups and investigated ten problems. We found that students who were provided diagrams never performed better and actually performed worse than the other students on three problems, one involving standing sound waves in a tube (discussed elsewhere) and two problems in electricity which we focus on here. These two problems were the only problems in electricity that involved considerations of initial and final conditions, which may partly account for why students provided with diagrams performed significantly worse than students who were not provided with diagrams. In order to explore potential reasons for this finding, we conducted interviews with students and found that some students provided with diagrams may have spent less time on the conceptual analysis and planning stage of the problem solving process. In particular, those provided with the diagram were more likely to jump into the implementation stage of problem solving early without fully analyzing and understanding the problem, which can increase the likelihood of mistakes in solutions.
References in corpus (14)
- When physical intuition fails
- Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part II: Effect of Some Potential Factors on Problem Solving and Transfer
- Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers
- Student understanding of symmetry and Gauss's law of electricity
- Assessing Expertise in Introductory Physics Using Categorization Task
- Using Isomorphic Problems to Learn Introductory Physics
- Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part I: Performance on Non-intuitive Problem Pair from Introductory Physics
- Using an Isomorphic Problem Pair to Learn Introductory Physics: Transferring from a Two-step Problem to a Three-step Problem
- Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
- Using Categorization of Problems as an Instructional Tool to Help Introductory Students Learn Physics
- Challenges in Analogical Reasoning
- To use or no to use diagrams: The effect of drawing a diagram in solving introductory physics problems
- Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems
- Coupling Conceptual and Quantitative Problems to Develop Expertise in Introductory Physics Students
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Development and Validation of a conceptual survey instrument to evaluate introductory physics students' understanding of thermodynamics
- Holistic framework to help students learn effectively from research-validated self-paced learning tools
- Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels
- Using multiple representations to improve student understanding of quantum states