Using an Isomorphic Problem Pair to Learn Introductory Physics: Transferring from a Two-step Problem to a Three-step Problem

Abstract

In this study, we examine introductory physics students' ability to perform analogical reasoning between two isomorphic problems which employ the same underlying physics principles but have different surface features. Three hundred and eighty two students from a calculus-based and an algebra-based introductory physics course were asked to learn from a solved problem provided and take advantage of what they learned from it to solve another isomorphic problem (which we call the quiz problem). The solved problem provided has two sub-problems while the quiz problem has three sub-problems, which is known to be challenging for introductory students from previous research. In addition to the solved problem, students also received extra scaffolding supports that were intended to help them discern and exploit the underlying similarities of the isomorphic solved and quiz problems. The results suggest that students had great difficulty in transferring what they learned from a 2-step problem to a 3-step problem. Although most students were able to learn from the solved problem to some extent with the scaffolding provided and invoke the relevant principles in the quiz problem, they were not necessarily able to apply the principles correctly. We also conducted think-aloud interviews with 6 introductory students in order to understand in-depth the difficulties they had and explore strategies to provide better scaffolding. The interviews suggest that students often superficially mapped the principles employed in the solved problem to the quiz problem without necessarily understanding the governing conditions underlying each principle and examining the applicability of the principle in the new situation in an in-depth manner. Findings suggest that more scaffolding is needed to help students in transferring from a two-step problem to a three step problem and applying the physics principles appropriately.

References in corpus (6)

• Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts
• Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part II: Effect of Some Potential Factors on Problem Solving and Transfer
• Using Isomorphic Problems to Learn Introductory Physics
• Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part I: Performance on Non-intuitive Problem Pair from Introductory Physics
• Transfer of Learning in Quantum Mechanics
• Effect of Self Diagnosis on Subsequent Problem Solving Performance

Cited by in corpus (13)

• Do evidence-based active-engagement courses reduce the gender gap in introductory physics?
• Challenges in designing appropriate scaffolding to improve students' representational consistency: The case of a Gauss's law problem
• Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part I: A brief review
• Impact of guided reflection with peers on the development of effective problem solving strategies and physics learning
• Development and Validation of a conceptual survey instrument to evaluate introductory physics students' understanding of thermodynamics
• Surveying Turkish high school and university student attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving
• Holistic framework to help students learn effectively from research-validated self-paced learning tools
• Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students' problem solving performance?
• Improving student understanding of quantum mechanics underlying the Stern-Gerlach experiment using a research-validated multiple-choice question sequence
• Impact of evidence-based flipped or active-engagement non-flipped courses on student performance in introductory physics
• Effect of Scaffolding on Helping Introductory Physics Students Solve Quantitative Problems Involving Strong Alternative Conceptions
• Using the Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels
• In a physics curriculum only introductory physics course grades show gender differences but do not predict future course performance for physics majors