Coupling Conceptual and Quantitative Problems to Develop Expertise in Introductory Physics Students

Abstract

We discuss the effect of administering conceptual and quantitative isomorphic problem pairs (CQIPP) back to back vs. asking students to solve only one of the problems in the CQIPP in introductory physics courses. Students who answered both questions in a CQIPP often performed better on the conceptual questions than those who answered the corresponding conceptual questions only. Although students often took advantage of the quantitative counterpart to answer a conceptual question of a CQIPP correctly, when only given the conceptual question, students seldom tried to convert it into a quantitative question, solve it and then reason about the solution conceptually. Even in individual interviews, when students who were only given conceptual questions had difficulty and the interviewer explicitly encouraged them to convert the conceptual question into the corresponding quantitative problem by choosing appropriate variables, a majority of students were reluctant and preferred to guess the answer to the conceptual question based upon their gut feeling.

4 page, PACS: 01.40Fk,01.40.gb,01.40G-,1.30.Rr. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part I: A brief review
• Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems
• Surveying Turkish high school and university student attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving
• Holistic framework to help students learn effectively from research-validated self-paced learning tools
• Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students' problem solving performance?
• Instructional Strategies that Foster Effective Problem-Solving