On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections
arXiv:1905.02989 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1278
Abstract
Dispersive delays due to the Solar wind introduce excess noise in high-precision pulsar timing experiments, and must be removed in order to achieve the accuracy needed to detect, e.g., low-frequency gravitational waves. In current pulsar timing experiments, this delay is usually removed by approximating the electron density distribution in the Solar wind either as spherically symmetric, or with a two-phase model that describes the contributions from both high- and low-speed phases of the Solar wind. However, no dataset has previously been available to test the performance and limitations of these models over extended timescales and with sufficient sensitivity. Here we present the results of such a test with an optimal dataset of observations of pulsar J0034-0534, taken with the German stations of LOFAR. We conclude that the spherical approximation performs systematically better than the two-phase model at almost all angular distances, with a residual root-mean-square (rms) given by the two-phase model being up to 28% larger than the result obtained with the spherical approximation. Nevertheless, the spherical approximation remains insufficiently accurate in modelling the Solar-wind delay (especially within 20 degrees of angular distance from the Sun), as it leaves timing residuals with rms values that reach the equivalent of 0.3 microseconds at 1400 MHz. This is because a spherical model ignores the large daily variations in electron density observed in the Solar wind. In the short term, broadband observations or simultaneous observations at low frequencies are the most promising way forward to correct for Solar-wind induced delay variations.
Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 17 pages, 13 figures
References in corpus (9)
- TEMPO2, a new pulsar timing package. I: Overview
- PSRCHIVE and PSRFITS An Open Approach to Radio Pulsar Data Storage and Analysis
- Tempo2, a new pulsar timing package. II: The timing model and precision estimates
- Expected properties of the first gravitational wave signal detected with pulsar timing arrays
- The formation heights of coronal shocks from 2D density and Alfvén speed maps
- Pulsar polarisation below 200 MHz: Average profiles and propagation effects
- Measuring pulse times of arrival from broadband pulsar observations
- An improved solar wind electron-density model for pulsar timing
- First detection of frequency-dependent, time-variable dispersion measures
Cited by in corpus (18)
- The NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set: Detector Characterization and Noise Budget
- Identifying and mitigating noise sources in precision pulsar timing data sets
- The impact of Solar wind variability on pulsar timing
- A Gamma-ray Pulsar Timing Array Constrains the Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Background
- Dispersion measure variability for 36 millisecond pulsars at 150MHz with LOFAR
- Accurate characterization of the stochastic gravitational-wave background with pulsar timing arrays by likelihood reweighting
- Bayesian Solar Wind Modeling with Pulsar Timing Arrays
- Status Report on Global Pulsar-Timing-Array Efforts to Detect Gravitational Waves
- Exploring the time variability of the Solar Wind using LOFAR pulsar data
- Pulsar Observations at Low Frequencies: Applications to Pulsar Timing and Solar Wind Models
- First Results from the REAL-time Transient Acquisition backend (REALTA) at the Irish LOFAR station
- Follow-up of 27 radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsars at 110-190 MHz using the international LOFAR station FR606
- Validation of heliospheric modeling algorithms through pulsar observations I: Interplanetary scintillation-based tomography
- Validation of heliospheric modeling algorithms through pulsar observations II: simulations with EUHFORIA
- Improving pulsar timing precision through superior Time-of-Arrival creation
- The Indian Pulsar Timing Array Data Release 2: II. Customised Single-Pulsar Noise Analysis and Noise Budget
- Long-term Timing Results of Ecliptic Pulsars Observed with I-LOFAR
- The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Customized Chromatic Noise Models