Re-Evaluating Small Long-Period Confirmed Planets From Kepler

Abstract

We re-examine the statistical confirmation of small long-period Kepler planet candidates in light of recent improvements in our understanding of the occurrence of systematic false alarms in this regime. Using the final Data Release 25 (DR25) Kepler planet candidate catalog statistics, we find that the previously confirmed single planet system Kepler-452b no longer achieves a 99% confidence in the planetary hypothesis and is not considered statistically validated in agreement with the finding of Mullally et al. (2018). For multiple planet systems, we find that the planet prior enhancement for belonging to a multiple planet system is suppressed relative to previous Kepler catalogs, and we identify the multi-planet system member, Kepler-186f, no longer achieves a 99% confidence in the planetary hypothesis. Because of the numerous confounding factors in the data analysis process that leads to the detection and characterization of a signal, it is difficult to determine whether any one planetary candidate achieves a strict criterion for confirmation relative to systematic false alarms. For instance, when taking into account a simplified model of processing variations, the additional single planet systems Kepler-443b, Kepler-441b, Kepler-1633b, Kepler-1178b, and Kepler-1653b have a non-negligible probability of falling below a 99% confidence in the planetary hypothesis. The systematic false alarm hypothesis must be taken into account when employing statistical validation techniques in order to confirm planet candidates that approach the detection threshold of a survey. We encourage those performing transit searches of K2, TESS, and other similar data sets to quantify their systematic false alarms rates. Alternatively, independent photometric detection of the transit signal or radial velocity measurements can eliminate the false alarm hypothesis.

18 Pages, 7 Figures, Accepted The Astronomical Journal

References in corpus (17)

• The K2 Mission: Characterization and Early results
• A Technique for Extracting Highly Precise Photometry for the Two-Wheeled Kepler Mission
• An Earth-sized Planet in the Habitable Zone of a Cool Star
• Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler VI: Planet Sample from Q1-Q16 (47 Months)
• Modeling Kepler transit light curves as false positives: Rejection of blend scenarios for Kepler-9, and validation of Kepler-9d, a super-Earth-size planet in a multiple system
• EVEREST: Pixel Level Decorrelation of K2 Light curves
• 197 Candidates and 104 Validated Planets in K2's First Five Fields
• PASTIS: Bayesian extrasolar planet validation. I. General framework, models, and performance
• Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler V: Planet Sample from Q1-Q12 (36 Months)
• Validation of Twelve Small Kepler Transiting Planets in the Habitable Zone
• Searching for Exoplanets Using Artificial Intelligence
• Automatic Classification of Kepler Planetary Transit Candidates
• KOI-3278: A Self-Lensing Binary Star System
• K2 Variable Catalogue: Variable Stars and Eclipsing Binaries in K2 Campaigns 1 and 0
• The Challenge of Wide-Field Transit Surveys: The Case of GSC 01944-02289
• Transit Shapes and Self Organising Maps as a Tool for Ranking Planetary Candidates: Application to Kepler and K2
• Validation of small Kepler transiting planet candidates in or near the habitable zone