Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
arXiv:1811.01705 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.004
Abstract
With the passage of more time from the original date of publication, the measure of the impact of scientific works using subsequent citation counts becomes more accurate. However the measurement of individual and organizational research productivity should ideally refer to a period with closing date just prior to the evaluation exercise. Therefore it is necessary to compromise between accuracy and timeliness. This work attempts to provide an order of magnitude for the error in measurement that occurs with decreasing the time lapse between date of publication and citation count. The analysis is conducted by scientific discipline on the basis of publications indexed in the Thomson Reuters Italian National Citation Report.
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (23)
- Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor
- The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy
- The collaboration behavior of top scientists
- Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement
- What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?
- Career advancement and scientific performance in universities
- Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks
- Peer review vs bibliometrics: which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?
- Gender bias in academic recruitment
- Are there too many uncited articles? Zero inflated variants of the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions
- Predicting the future success of scientific publications through social network and semantic analysis
- A sensitivity analysis of researchers' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
- How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy
- A nation's foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (The Italian case)
- Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: which strategy pays off?
- Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items
- Who benefits from a country's scientific research?
- The determinants of academic career advancement: evidence from Italy
- A sensitivity analysis of research institutions' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
- From rankings to funnel plots: the question of accounting for uncertainty when measuring university research performance
- Funnel plots for visualizing uncertainty in the research performance of institutions
- A methodology to compute the territorial productivity of scientists: The case of Italy
- Informed peer review for publication assessments: Are improved impact measures worth the hassle?