A sensitivity analysis of research institutions' productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
arXiv:1811.01699 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.005
Abstract
One of the critical issues in bibliometric research assessments is the time required to achieve maturity in citations. Citation counts can be considered a reliable proxy of the real impact of a work only if they are observed after sufficient time has passed from publication date. In the present work the authors investigate the effect of varying the time of citation observation on accuracy of productivity rankings for research institutions. Research productivity measures are calculated for all Italian universities active in the hard sciences in the 2001-2003 period, by individual field and discipline, with the time of the citation observation varying from 2004 to 2008. The objective is to support policy-makers in choosing a citation window that optimizes the tradeoff between accuracy of rankings and timeliness of the exercise.
References in corpus (4)
- Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
- Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
- A field-standardized application of DEA to national-scale research assessment of universities