The determinants of academic career advancement: evidence from Italy

Abstract

In this work we investigate the determinants of professors' career advancement in Italian universities. From the analyses, it emerges that the fundamental determinant of an academic candidate's success is not scientific merit, but rather the number of years that the candidate has belonged to the same university as the selection committee president. Where applicants have participated in research work with the president, their probability of success also increases significantly. The factors of the years of service and occurrence of joint research for the other commission members also have an effect, however of lesser weight. The specific phenomenon of nepotism, although it exists, seems less important. The scientific quality of the commission members has negligible effect on the expected outcome of the competition, and even more so the geographic location of the university calling for the competition.

References in corpus (12)

• How do you define and measure research productivity?
• A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
• Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
• The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
• Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
• What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?
• The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance
• Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges
• Career advancement and scientific performance in universities
• The dispersion of research performance within and between universities as a potential indicator of the competitive intensity in higher education systems
• Relatives in the same university faculty: nepotism or merit?
• Assessing national strengths and weaknesses in research fields

Cited by in corpus (2)

• A methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover
• Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification