Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement
arXiv:1811.01636 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001
Abstract
The development of scientometric indicators and methods for evaluative purposes, requires a multitude of assumptions, conventions, limitations, and caveats. Given this, we cannot permit ambiguities in the key concepts forming the basis of scientometric science itself, or research assessment exercises would rest on quicksand. This conceptual work attempts to spell out some principles leading to a clear definition of "impact" of research, and above all, of the appropriate scientometric indicator to measure it. The aim is to stimulate a discussion aimed at a definitive convergence on the meaning and measurement of a fundamental concept of the scientometric science.
References in corpus (8)
- How do you define and measure research productivity?
- Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?
- Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: A Conceptual Overview of the Literature
- Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
- National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings
- A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators
- Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?
- Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011-2014)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor
- The collaboration behavior of top scientists
- Peer review vs bibliometrics: which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications?
- A nation's foreign and domestic professors: which have better research performance? (The Italian case)
- Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items
- The balance of knowledge flows
- A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level
- Testing for universality of Mendeley readership distributions
- On the relation between the degree of internationalization of cited and citing publications: A field level analysis, including and excluding self-citations
- The domestic localization of knowledge flows as evidenced by publication citation: The case of Italy
- Bibliometric Profile of an Emerging Journal: Participatory Educational Research
- Informed peer review for publication assessments: Are improved impact measures worth the hassle?