Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items
arXiv:1809.06088 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.008
Abstract
Bibliometricians have long recurred to citation counts to measure the impact of publications on the advancement of science. However, since the earliest days of the field, some scholars have questioned whether all citations should be worth the same, and have gone on to weight them by a variety of factors. However sophisticated the operationalization of the measures, the methodologies used in weighting citations still present limits in their underlying assumptions. This work takes an alternative approach to resolving the underlying problem: the proposal is to value citations by the impact of the citing articles, regardless of the length of their reference list. As well as conceptualizing a new indicator of impact, the work illustrates its application to the 2004-2012 Italian scientific production indexed in the WoS. The proposed impact indicator is highly correlated to the traditional citation count, however the shifts observed between the two measures are frequent and the number of outliers not negligible. Moreover, the new indicator shows greater "sensitivity" when used to identify the highly-cited papers.
References in corpus (11)
- Finding Scientific Gems with Google
- Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
- How do you define and measure research productivity?
- Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor
- Eigenfactor : Does the Principle of Repeated Improvement Result in Better Journal Impact Estimates than Raw Citation Counts?
- Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
- Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement
- A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators
- Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
- Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?
- Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011-2014)