On the two main classes of Active Galactic Nuclei

Abstract

Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are traditionally divided empirically into two main classes: "radio-loud" and "radio-quiet" sources. These labels, which are more than fifty years old, are obsolete, misleading, and wrong. I argue that AGN should be classified based on a fundamentally physical rather than just an observational difference, namely the presence (or lack) of strong relativistic jets, and that we should use the terms "jetted" and "non-jetted" AGN instead.

Author's version of Nature Astronomy Comment. 5 pages, 1 figure. See https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-017-0194

References in corpus (3)

• The Co-Evolution of Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes: Insights from Surveys of the Contemporary Universe
• The faint radio sky: radio astronomy becomes mainstream
• Rolling down from the 30 keV peak: modelling the hard X-ray and gamma-ray backgrounds

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Active Galactic Nuclei: what's in a name?
• Prevalence of radio jets associated with galactic outflows and feedback from quasars
• Morphological classification of radio galaxies: Capsule Networks versus Convolutional Neural Networks
• General Physical Properties of Gamma-ray Emitting Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies
• Composite Spectral Energy Distributions and Infrared-Optical Colors of Type 1 and Type 2 Quasars
• Strong lensing reveals jets in a sub-microJy radio quiet quasar
• A VLA-GMRT Look at 11 Powerful FR II Quasars
• Unveiling the 100 pc scale nuclear radio structure of NGC 6217 with e-MERLIN and the VLA
• X-ray analysis of the accreting supermassive black hole in the radio galaxy PKS 2251+11
• An XMM-Newton look at the strongly variable radio-weak BL Lac Fermi J1544-0639