How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality

Abstract

Algorithms that favor popular items are used to help us select among many choices, from engaging articles on a social media news feed to songs and books that others have purchased, and from top-raked search engine results to highly-cited scientific papers. The goal of these algorithms is to identify high-quality items such as reliable news, beautiful movies, prestigious information sources, and important discoveries --- in short, high-quality content should rank at the top. Prior work has shown that choosing what is popular may amplify random fluctuations and ultimately lead to sub-optimal rankings. Nonetheless, it is often assumed that recommending what is popular will help high-quality content "bubble up" in practice. Here we identify the conditions in which popularity may be a viable proxy for quality content by studying a simple model of cultural market endowed with an intrinsic notion of quality. A parameter representing the cognitive cost of exploration controls the critical trade-off between quality and popularity. We find a regime of intermediate exploration cost where an optimal balance exists, such that choosing what is popular actually promotes high-quality items to the top. Outside of these limits, however, popularity bias is more likely to hinder quality. These findings clarify the effects of algorithmic popularity bias on quality outcomes, and may inform the design of more principled mechanisms for techno-social cultural markets.

References in corpus (2)

• Scale-free network growth by ranking
• Quantifying Biases in Online Information Exposure

Cited by in corpus (23)

• The spread of low-credibility content by social bots
• Anatomy of an online misinformation network
• Social Influence and Unfollowing Accelerate the Emergence of Echo Chambers
• Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation
• Neutral bots probe political bias on social media
• Flow of online misinformation during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy
• The effect of algorithmic bias and network structure on coexistence, consensus, and polarization of opinions
• Public awareness and attitudes towards search engine optimization
• Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking
• The voice of few, the opinions of many: evidence of social biases in Twitter COVID-19 fake news sharing
• The few-get-richer: a surprising consequence of popularity-based rankings
• Towards Individual and Multistakeholder Fairness in Tourism Recommender Systems
• The effect of Collaborative-Filtering based Recommendation Algorithms on Opinion Polarization
• A Comparative Analysis of Bias Amplification in Graph Neural Network Approaches for Recommender Systems
• The long-term impact of ranking algorithms in growing networks
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics
• Can crowdsourcing rescue the social marketplace of ideas?
• Opinion formation on social networks with algorithmic bias: Dynamics and bias imbalance
• Filter Bubble effect in the multistate voter model
• Reconciling the Quality vs Popularity Dichotomy in Online Cultural Markets
• Searching Personal Collections
• Italian Twitter semantic network during the Covid-19 epidemic