Can crowdsourcing rescue the social marketplace of ideas?

Abstract

Facebook and Twitter recently announced community-based review platforms to address misinformation. We provide an overview of the potential affordances of such community-based approaches to content moderation based on past research and preliminary analysis of Twitter's Birdwatch data. While our analysis generally supports a community-based approach to content moderation, it also warns against potential pitfalls, particularly when the implementation of the new infrastructure focuses on crowd-based "validation" rather than "collaboration." We call for multidisciplinary research utilizing methods from complex systems studies, behavioural sociology, and computational social science to advance the research on crowd-based content moderation.

arXiv commentIn Press in Communications of the ACM (CACM)

References in corpus (11)

• Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia
• Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity
• Social Influence and Unfollowing Accelerate the Emergence of Echo Chambers
• Even Good Bots Fight: The Case of Wikipedia
• How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality
• The Wisdom of Polarized Crowds
• The production of information in the attention economy
• Opinions, Conflicts and Consensus: Modeling Social Dynamics in a Collaborative Environment
• Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation
• Positive algorithmic bias cannot stop fragmentation in homophilic networks
• Understanding and coping with extremism in an online collaborative environment