Anatomy of an online misinformation network
arXiv:1801.06122 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196087
Abstract
Massive amounts of fake news and conspiratorial content have spread over social media before and after the 2016 US Presidential Elections despite intense fact-checking efforts. How do the spread of misinformation and fact-checking compete? What are the structural and dynamic characteristics of the core of the misinformation diffusion network, and who are its main purveyors? How to reduce the overall amount of misinformation? To explore these questions we built Hoaxy, an open platform that enables large-scale, systematic studies of how misinformation and fact-checking spread and compete on Twitter. Hoaxy filters public tweets that include links to unverified claims or fact-checking articles. We perform k-core decomposition on a diffusion network obtained from two million retweets produced by several hundred thousand accounts over the six months before the election. As we move from the periphery to the core of the network, fact-checking nearly disappears, while social bots proliferate. The number of users in the main core reaches equilibrium around the time of the election, with limited churn and increasingly dense connections. We conclude by quantifying how effectively the network can be disrupted by penalizing the most central nodes. These findings provide a first look at the anatomy of a massive online misinformation diffusion network.
28 pages, 11 figures, submitted to PLOS ONE
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (32)
- Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots
- Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifiers
- Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections
- Investigating Italian disinformation spreading on Twitter in the context of 2019 European elections
- Topology comparison of Twitter diffusion networks effectively reveals misleading information
- One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Study
- Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation
- Mining social media data for biomedical signals and health-related behavior
- Optimizing sensors placement in complex networks for localization of hidden signal source: A review
- Characterizing networks of propaganda on Twitter: a case study
- Bots, Disinformation, and the First Trump Impeachment
- Simplistic Collection and Labeling Practices Limit the Utility of Benchmark Datasets for Twitter Bot Detection
- Bot Electioneering Volume: Visualizing Social Bot Activity During Elections
- False News On Social Media: A Data-Driven Survey
- Adapting Security Warnings to Counter Online Disinformation
- Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics
- A Network Topology Approach to Bot Classification
- Promoting and countering misinformation during Australia's 2019-2020 bushfires: A case study of polarisation
- Social Bots and Social Media Manipulation in 2020: The Year in Review
- Mutual Hyperlinking Among Misinformation Peddlers
- A Multi-Platform Collection of Social Media Posts about the 2022 U.S. Midterm Elections
- Jump on the Bandwagon? -- Characterizing Bandwagon Phenomenon in Online NBA Fan Communities
- Online disinformation in the 2020 U.S. Election: swing vs. safe states
- The Rumour Mill: Making the Spread of Misinformation Explicit and Tangible
- Model Generalization on COVID-19 Fake News Detection
- Wikipedia in Wartime: Experiences of Wikipedians Maintaining Articles About the Russia-Ukraine War
- Combating Disinformation in a Social Media Age
- A multi-layer approach to disinformation detection on Twitter
- An Analysis of Socialbots Activity and Influence in Modern Japanese Social Media
- An organized review of key factors for fake news detection
- A Classification Algorithm to Recognize Fake News Websites
- Examining the tech stacks of Czech and Slovak untrustworthy websites