The effect of algorithmic bias and network structure on coexistence, consensus, and polarization of opinions

Abstract

Individuals of modern societies share ideas and participate in collective processes within a pervasive, variable, and mostly hidden ecosystem of content filtering technologies that determine what information we see online. Despite the impact of these algorithms on daily life and society, little is known about their effect on information transfer and opinion formation. It is thus unclear to what extent algorithmic bias has a harmful influence on collective decision-making, such as a tendency to polarize debate. Here we introduce a general theoretical framework to systematically link models of opinion dynamics, social network structure, and content filtering. We showcase the flexibility of our framework by exploring a family of binary-state opinion dynamics models where information exchange lies in a spectrum from pairwise to group interactions. All models show an opinion polarization regime driven by algorithmic bias and modular network structure. The role of content filtering is, however, surprisingly nuanced; for pairwise interactions it leads to polarization, while for group interactions it promotes coexistence of opinions. This allows us to pinpoint which social interactions are robust against algorithmic bias, and which ones are susceptible to bias-enhanced opinion polarization. Our framework gives theoretical ground for the development of heuristics to tackle harmful effects of online bias, such as information bottlenecks, echo chambers, and opinion radicalization.

References in corpus (30)

• The structure and function of complex networks
• Statistical physics of social dynamics
• Temporal Networks
• The Rise of Social Bots
• Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks
• Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks
• Voter Models on Heterogeneous Networks
• The Statistical Physics of Real-World Networks
• The non-linear q-voter model
• High-accuracy approximation of binary-state dynamics on networks
• Binary-state dynamics on complex networks: pair approximation and beyond
• Analytical Solution of the Voter Model on Disordered Networks
• How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality
• Network reconstruction and community detection from dynamics
• Modeling human dynamics of face-to-face interaction networks
• Ordering dynamics with two non-excluding options: Bilingualism in language competition
• Phase transitions in the q-voter model with two types of stochastic driving
• Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks
• Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion polarization: A bounded confidence model
• Kinetics of Social Contagion
• Quantifying Biases in Online Information Exposure
• Nonlinear Voter Models: The Transition from Invasion to Coexistence
• Heterogeneous pair approximation for voter models on networks
• Pair approximation for the q-voter model with independence on complex networks
• Analytical and numerical study of the non-linear noisy voter model on complex networks
• Threshold driven contagion on weighted networks
• Stochastic pair approximation treatment of the noisy voter model
• Pair approximation for the noisy threshold $q$-voter model
• Positive algorithmic bias cannot stop fragmentation in homophilic networks
• Binary-state dynamics on complex networks: Stochastic pair approximation and beyond

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Opinion formation on social networks with algorithmic bias: Dynamics and bias imbalance
• On a Voter Model with Context-Dependent Opinion Adoption