Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance

Abstract

We analyze the effectiveness of working in pairs on the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism test in a calculus-based introductory physics course. Students who collaborated with a peer showed significantly larger normalized gain on individual testing than those who did not collaborate. We did not find statistically significant differences between the performance of students who were given an opportunity to formulate their own response before the peer discussions, compared to those who were not. Peer collaboration also shows evidence for co-construction of knowledge. Discussions with individual students show that students themselves value peer interaction. We discuss the effect of pairing students with different individual achievements.

6 pages, PACS: 01.40Fk,01.40.gb,01.40G-, Keywords: Physics Education Research, problem solving, expertise, intuition, learning, teaching, pedagogy, expert novice differences

Cited by in corpus (27)

• A Review of Student Difficulties in Upper-Level Quantum Mechanics
• A Framework for Understanding the Patterns of Student Reasoning Difficulties in Quantum Mechanics
• Hermione and the Secretary: How gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning
• Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers
• Improving Students' Understanding of Quantum Measurement Part 2: Development of Research-based Learning Tools
• Do evidence-based active-engagement courses reduce the gender gap in introductory physics?
• Challenges in designing appropriate scaffolding to improve students' representational consistency: The case of a Gauss's law problem
• Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part I: A brief review
• Impact of guided reflection with peers on the development of effective problem solving strategies and physics learning
• Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems
• Surveying Turkish high school and university student attitudes and approaches to physics problem solving
• What Can Learn from PER: Physics Education Research?
• Peer interaction facilitates co-construction of knowledge in quantum mechanics
• Exploring one aspect of pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• Challenges in addressing student difficulties with quantum measurement of two-state quantum systems using a multiple-choice question sequence in online and in-person classes
• Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels
• Impact of evidence-based flipped or active-engagement non-flipped courses on student performance in introductory physics
• Challenges in addressing student difficulties with basics and change of basis for two-state quantum systems using a multiple-choice question sequence in online and in-person classes
• Lessons from Transforming Second-Year Honors Physics Lab
• How often does unguided peer interaction lead to correct response consensus? An example from Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
• Using Unguided Peer Collaboration to Facilitate Early Educators' Pedagogical Development: An Example from Physics TA Training
• Improving student understanding of quantum measurement in infinite-dimensional Hilbert space using a research-based multiple-choice question sequence
• Introductory Physics Students in Algebra-based Courses Who Typically Worked Alone or in Groups: Insights from Gender-Based Analysis before and during COVID-19
• How the learning environment predicts male and female students' motivational beliefs in algebra-based introductory physics courses
• Opinion dynamics model of collaborative learning
• Closing the Gap between Teaching and Assessment
• Peer Influence on Physics Self-Efficacy and Grades: A comparative study of students in an introductory calculus-based course who typically worked alone or in groups before and during the pandemic