Model of human collective decision-making in complex environments

Abstract

A continuous-time Markov process is proposed to analyze how a group of humans solves a complex task, consisting in the search of the optimal set of decisions on a fitness landscape. Individuals change their opinions driven by two different forces: (i) the self-interest, which pushes them to increase their own fitness values, and (ii) the social interactions, which push individuals to reduce the diversity of their opinions in order to reach consensus. Results show that the performance of the group is strongly affected by the strength of social interactions and by the level of knowledge of the individuals. Increasing the strength of social interactions improves the performance of the team. However, too strong social interactions slow down the search of the optimal solution and worsen the performance of the group. In particular, we find that the threshold value of the social interaction strength, which leads to the emergence of a superior intelligence of the group, is just the critical threshold at which the consensus among the members sets in. We also prove that a moderate level of knowledge is already enough to guarantee high performance of the group in making decisions.

12 pages, 8 figues in European Physical Journal B, 2015

References in corpus (8)

• Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles
• Statistical physics of social dynamics
• The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks
• A common rule for decision-making in animal collectives across species
• Towards real-world complexity: an introduction to multiplex networks
• A simple model for multiple-choice collective decision making
• Imitation versus payoff - duality of the decision-making process demonstrates criticality and consensus formation
• Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models

Cited by in corpus (6)

• The Trump phenomenon, an explanation from sociophysics
• Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias
• Unanimity, Coexistence and Rigidity: Three Sides of Polarization
• Asymmetric contrarians in opinion dynamics
• Radicalism: The asymmetric stance of Radicals versus Conventionals
• Information theoretical view of QCD effective model with heavy quarks