The Trump phenomenon, an explanation from sociophysics
arXiv:1609.03933 · doi:10.1142/S0217979217420152
Abstract
The Trump phenomenon is argued to depart from current populist rise in Europe. According to a model of opinion dynamics from sociophysics the machinery of Trump's amazing success obeys well-defined counter-intuitive rules. Therefore, his success was in principle predictable from the start. The model uses local majority rule arguments and obeys a threshold dynamics. The associated tipping points are found to depend on the leading collective beliefs, cognitive biases and prejudices of the social group which undertakes the public debate. And here comes the sesame of the Trump campaign, which develops along two successive steps. During a first moment, Trump's statement produces a majority of voters against him. But at the same time, according to the model the shocking character of the statement modifies the prejudice balance. In case the prejudice is present even being frozen among voters, the tipping point is lowered at Trump's benefit. Nevertheless, although the tipping point has been lowered by the activation of frozen prejudices it is instrumental to preserve enough support from openly prejudiced people to be above the threshold. Then, as infuriated voters launch intense debate, occurrence of ties will drive progressively hostile people to shift their voting intention without needing to endorse the statement which has infuriated them. The on going debate does drive towards a majority for Trump. The possible Trump victory at November Presidential election is discussed. In particular, the model shows that to eventually win the Presidential election, Trump must not modify his past shocking attitude but to appeal to a different spectrum of frozen prejudices, which are common to both Democrats and Republicans.
24 pages, 9 figures, to appear in International Journal of Modern Physics B
References in corpus (16)
- Statistical physics of social dynamics
- Sociophysics: A review of Galam models
- Mobility and Social Network Effects on Extremist Opinions
- The cost of attack in competing networks
- Inflexibility and independence: Phase transitions in the majority-rule model
- Fixation and Polarization in a Three-Species Opinion Dynamics Model
- Competing Effects of Social Balance and Influence
- Model of human collective decision-making in complex environments
- Opinion Formation in Laggard Societies
- The interplay between conformity and anticonformity and its polarizing effect on society
- Bifurcations in models of a society of reasonable contrarians and conformists
- Why, when, and how fast innovations are adopted
- Balancer effects in opinion dynamics
- Role of the plurality rule in multiple choices
- Critical phenomena in the spreading of opinion consensus and disagreement
- How fear of future outcomes affects social dynamics
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Recent advances in opinion propagation dynamics: A 2020 Survey
- Statistical Physics Of Opinion Formation: is it a SPOOF?
- From classical to modern opinion dynamics
- Tipping points in opinion dynamics: a universal formula in five dimensions
- Homogeneous symmetrical threshold model with nonconformity: independence vs. anticonformity
- Dynamics of two-group conflicts: A statistical physics model
- General consensus with circular opinion under attractive and repulsive mechanisms
- Deviations from the Majority: A Local Flip Model
- Phase transition and universality of the majority-rule model on complex networks
- Vanishing opinions in Latané model of opinion formation
- Phase transition in the Galam's majority-rule model with information-mediated independence
- Emergence of moderate opinions as a consequence of group pressure
- Opinion Dynamics on Networks under Correlated Disordered External Perturbations
- Models of Opinion Dynamics with Random Parametrisation
- Nonequilibrium phase transitions in a racism-spreading model with interaction-driven dynamics