Competing Effects of Social Balance and Influence
arXiv:1507.04410 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042306
Abstract
We study a three-state (leftist, rightist, centrist) model that couples the dynamics of social balance with an external deradicalizing field. The mean-field analysis shows that there exists a critical value of the external field such that for a weak external field (), the system exhibits a metastable fixed point and a saddle point in addition to a stable fixed point. However, if the strength of the external field is sufficiently large (), there is only one (stable) fixed point which corresponds to an all-centrist consensus state (absorbing state). In the weak-field regime, the convergence time to the absorbing state is evaluated using the quasi-stationary distribution and is found to be in agreement with the results obtained by numerical simulations.
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (16)
- Network resilience
- The Trump phenomenon, an explanation from sociophysics
- Homophily based on few attributes can impede structural balance
- Social nucleation: Group formation as a phase transition
- Quartic Balance Theory: Global Minimum With Imbalanced Triangles
- Social Stability and Extended Social Balance - Quantifying the Role of Inactive Links in Social Networks
- Unanimity, Coexistence and Rigidity: Three Sides of Polarization
- Heider Balance under Disordered Triadic Interactions
- Mean-Field Solution for Critical Behavior of Signed Networks in Competitive Balance Theory
- Heider and coevolutionary balance: From discrete to continuous phase transition
- Radicalism: The asymmetric stance of Radicals versus Conventionals
- Hybrid balance theory: Heider balance under higher order interactions
- Modified Heider Balance on Sparse Random Networks
- Response of the competitive balance model to the external field
- Mesoscopic analytical approach in a three state opinion model with continuous internal variable
- Balanced and fragmented phases in societies with homophily and social balance