Unanimity, Coexistence and Rigidity: Three Sides of Polarization
arXiv:2306.14335 · doi:10.3390/e25040622
Abstract
Political polarization is perceived as a threat to democracies. Using the Galam model of opinion dynamics deployed in a five-dimensional parameter space, I show that polarization is the byproduct of an essential hallmark of a vibrant democratic society, namely the open and informal discussions among agents. Indeed, within a homogeneous social community with floaters, the dynamics leads gradually toward unanimity (zero entropy). Polarization can eventually appear as the juxtaposition of non-mixing social groups sharing different prejudices about the issue at stake. On the other hand, the inclusion of contrarian agents produces a polarization within a community that mixes when their proportion is beyond a critical value for discussing groups of size 3 and 4. Similarly, the presence of stubborn agents produces also a polarization of a community that mixes when the proportion of stubborns is greater than some critical value. For equal proportions of stubborns along each opinion, for group size 4 against for group size 3. However, the evaluation of the proportion of individual opinion shifts at the attractor indicates that the polarization produced by contrarians is fluid with a good deal of agents who keep shifting between the two opposed blocks (high entropy). That favors a coexistence of opposite opinions in a divided community. In contrast, the polarization created by stubborn agents is found to be frozen with very few individuals shifting opinion between the two opinions (low entropy). That yields a basis for the emergence of hate between the frozen opposed blocks.
27 pages, 6 figures
References in corpus (12)
- The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics
- Emergence of polarized ideological opinions in multidimensional topic spaces
- Fixation and Polarization in a Three-Species Opinion Dynamics Model
- Noise induced unanimity and disorder in opinion formation
- Why, when, and how fast innovations are adopted
- Opinion Dynamics and Unifying Principles: A Global Unifying Frame
- Transitions between polarization and radicalization in a temporal bilayer echo chambers model
- A model for the competition between political mono-polarization and bi-polarization
- Critical phenomena in the spreading of opinion consensus and disagreement
- Deviations from the Majority: A Local Flip Model
- Radicalization phenomena: Phase transitions, extinction processes and control of violent activities
- Contrarian Voter Model under the influence of an Oscillating Propaganda: Consensus, Bimodal behavior and Stochastic Resonance