Frequency of Close Companions among Kepler Planets - a TTV study
arXiv:1308.3751 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/165
Abstract
A transiting planet exhibits sinusoidal transit-time-variations (TTVs) if perturbed by a companion near a mean-motion-resonance (MMR). We search for sinusoidal TTVs in more than 2600 Kepler candidates, using the publicly available Kepler light-curves (Q0-Q12). We find that the TTV fractions rise strikingly with the transit multiplicity. Systems where four or more planets transit enjoy roughly five times higher TTV fraction than those where a single planet transits, and about twice higher than those for doubles and triples. In contrast, models in which all transiting planets arise from similar dynamical configurations predict comparable TTV fractions among these different systems. One simple explanation for our results is that there are at least two different classes of Kepler systems, one closely packed and one more sparsely populated.
7 pages, 5 figures, 1 table, accepted to ApJ
References in corpus (5)
- The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms
- DHP Framework: Digital Health Passports Using Blockchain -- Use case on international tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Densities and Eccentricities of 139 Kepler Planets from Transit Time Variations
- Transit Timing Variation of Near-Resonance Planetary Pairs. II. Confirmation of 30 planets in 15 Multiple Planet Systems
- 150 New transiting planet candidates from Kepler Q1-Q6 data
Cited by in corpus (27)
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems
- Understanding the Mass-Radius Relation for Sub-Neptunes: Radius as a Proxy for Composition
- About 30% of Sun-like Stars Have Kepler-like Planetary Systems: A Study of their Intrinsic Architecture
- Exoplanet Statistics and Theoretical Implications
- Measurement of planet masses with transit timing variations due to synodic "chopping" effects
- Transit timing to first order in eccentricity
- Predicted Number, Multiplicity, and Orbital Dynamics of TESS M Dwarf Exoplanets
- The Kepler Dichotomy in Planetary Disks: Linking Kepler Observables to Simulations of Late-Stage Planet Formation
- Robo-AO Kepler Planetary Candidate Survey III: Adaptive Optics Imaging of 1629 Kepler Exoplanet Candidate Host Stars
- Hiding Planets Behind a Big Friend: Mutual Inclinations of Multi-Planet Systems with External Companions
- Influence of Stellar Multiplicity On Planet Formation. IV. Adaptive Optics Imaging of Kepler Stars With Multiple Transiting Planet Candidates
- Robo-AO Kepler Survey V: The effect of physically associated stellar companions on planetary systems
- A spectral approach to transit timing variations
- Unbiasing the density of TTV-characterised sub-Neptunes: Update of the mass-radius relationship of 34 Kepler planets
- Alleviating the transit timing variation bias in transit surveys. I. RIVERS: Method and detection of a pair of resonant super-Earths around Kepler-1705
- Transiting Exoplanet Monitoring Project (TEMP). II. Refined System Parameters and Transit Timing Analysis of HAT-P-33b
- Prospects for TTV Detection and Dynamical Constraints with TESS
- Orbital Stability and Precession Effects in the Kepler-89 System
- Visual Analysis and Demographics of Kepler Transit Timing Variations
- Updated Catalog of Kepler Planet Candidates: Focus on Accuracy and Orbital Periods
- Alleviating the Transit Timing Variations bias in transit surveys. II. RIVERS: Twin resonant Earth-sized planets around Kepler-1972 recovered from Kepler's false positive
- WASP-35 and HAT-P-30/WASP-51: re-analysis using TESS and ground-based transit photometry
- The study on transiting systems HAT-P-13, HAT-P-16 and WASP-32 through combining ground-based and TESS photometry
- A homogeneous TTV investigation of all TESS systems with a confirmed single transiting planet
- The Robo-AO KOI Survey: laser adaptive optics imaging of every Kepler exoplanet candidate
- Mass Upper Bounds for Over 50 Kepler Planets Using Low-S/N Transit Timing Variations
- Accounting for Transit Timing Detectability: Biases in Planetary Radius and Orbital Period