The fine-tuning cost of the likelihood in SUSY models
arXiv:1208.0837 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.11.007
Abstract
In SUSY models, the fine tuning of the electroweak (EW) scale with respect to their parameters gamma_i={m_0, m_{1/2}, mu_0, A_0, B_0,...} and the maximal likelihood L to fit the experimental data are usually regarded as two different problems. We show that, if one regards the EW minimum conditions as constraints that fix the EW scale, this commonly held view is not correct and that the likelihood contains all the information about fine-tuning. In this case we show that the corrected likelihood is equal to the ratio L/Delta of the usual likelihood L and the traditional fine tuning measure Delta of the EW scale. A similar result is obtained for the integrated likelihood over the set {gamma_i}, that can be written as a surface integral of the ratio L/Delta, with the surface in gamma_i space determined by the EW minimum constraints. As a result, a large likelihood actually demands a large ratio L/Delta or equivalently, a small chi^2_{new}=chi^2_{old}+2*ln(Delta). This shows the fine-tuning cost to the likelihood (chi^2_{new}) of the EW scale stability enforced by SUSY, that is ignored in data fits. A good chi^2_{new}/d.o.f.\approx 1 thus demands SUSY models have a fine tuning amount Delta<<exp(d.o.f./2), which provides a model-independent criterion for acceptable fine-tuning. If this criterion is not met, one can thus rule out SUSY models without a further chi^2/d.o.f. analysis. Numerical methods to fit the data can easily be adapted to account for this effect.
10 pages (v3: small comment added)
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (37)
- Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH
- SUSY models under siege: LHC constraints and electroweak fine-tuning
- How conventional measures overestimate electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric theory
- A recipe for EFT uncertainty quantification in nuclear physics
- Is the Higgs Boson Associated with Coleman-Weinberg Dynamical Symmetry Breaking?
- Revisiting fine-tuning in the MSSM
- Non-universal gaugino masses and fine tuning implications for SUSY searches in the MSSM and the GNMSSM
- The health of SUSY after the Higgs discovery and the XENON100 data
- Is Natural SUSY Natural?
- What is a Natural SUSY scenario?
- Bayesian naturalness of the CMSSM and CNMSSM
- Supergravity gauge theories strike back: There is no crisis for SUSY but a new collider may be required for discovery
- Fine Tuning in the Constrained Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
- A precision study of the fine tuning in the DiracNMSSM
- Generalized Soft Breaking Leverage for the MSSM
- Probing Non-holomorphic MSSM via precision constraints, dark matter and LHC data
- Stop on Top: SUSY Parameter Regions, Fine-Tuning Constraints
- Quantum implications of a scale invariant regularisation
- Z' mass limits and the naturalness of supersymmetry
- General NMSSM signatures at the LHC
- Where to look for natural supersymmetry
- Exploring Non-Holomorphic Soft Terms in the Framework of Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking
- Fixing the EW scale in supersymmetric models after the Higgs discovery
- Supersoft Supersymmetry, Conformal Sequestering, and Single Scale Supersymmetry Breaking
- Precise determination of the Higgs mass in supersymmetric models with vectorlike tops and the impact on naturalness in minimal GMSB
- Higgs diphoton rate enhancement from supersymmetric physics beyond the MSSM
- Naturalness in low-scale SUSY models and "non-linear" MSSM
- Quasi Yukawa Unification and Fine-Tuning in U(1) Extended SSM
- Stop-mass prediction in naturalness scenarios within MSSM-25
- Sbottoms as probes to MSSM with nonholomorphic soft interactions
- Least Fine-Tuned U(1) Extended SSM
- Bayesian naturalness, simplicity, and testability applied to the MSSM GUT
- Dominant production of heavier Higgs bosons through vector boson fusion in NMSSM
- Testing Higgs boson scenarios in the phenomenological NMSSM
- Electroweak Naturalness and Deflected Mirage Mediation
- SUSY naturalness without prejudice
- Toy models for hierarchy studies