507 citations
Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.
- Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUS17 papers
- Khalifa University of Science and TechnologyAE13 papers
- MIT Media LabUS7 papers
- Kyoto UniversityJP5 papers
- University of EdinburghGB5 papers
- Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFR4 papers
- Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto UniversityJP4 papers
- Cardiff UniversityGB3 papers
- Chinese University of Hong KongHK3 papers
- National Research University Higher School of EconomicsRU3 papers
- Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyUS3 papers
- The University of TokyoJP3 papers
5 papers · 1 filter
Regulating Highly Automated Robot Ecologies: Insights from Three User Studies
Wen Shen, Alanoud Al Khemeiri, Abdulla Almehrezi +3
Highly automated robot ecologies (HARE), or societies of independent autonomous robots or agents, are rapidly becoming an important part of much of the world's critical infrastruct…
Cooperating with Machines
Jacob W. Crandall, Mayada Oudah, Tennom +7
Since Alan Turing envisioned Artificial Intelligence (AI) [1], a major driving force behind technical progress has been competition with human cognition. Historical milestones have…
Pareto Optimality and Strategy Proofness in Group Argument Evaluation (Extended Version)
Edmond Awad, Martin Caminada, Gabriella Pigozzi +2
An inconsistent knowledge base can be abstracted as a set of arguments and a defeat relation among them. There can be more than one consistent way to evaluate such an argumentation…
Belief and Truth in Hypothesised Behaviours
Stefano V. Albrecht, Jacob W. Crandall, Subramanian Ramamoorthy
There is a long history in game theory on the topic of Bayesian or "rational" learning, in which each player maintains beliefs over a set of alternative behaviours, or types, for t…
Judgment Aggregation in Multi-Agent Argumentation
Edmond Awad, Richard Booth, Fernando Tohme +1
Given a set of conflicting arguments, there can exist multiple plausible opinions about which arguments should be accepted, rejected, or deemed undecided. We study the problem of h…