Consistent Quantum Counterfactuals

Abstract

An analysis using classical stochastic processes is used to construct a consistent system of quantum counterfactual reasoning. When applied to a counterfactual version of Hardy's paradox, it shows that the probabilistic character of quantum reasoning together with the ``one framework'' rule prevents a logical contradiction, and there is no evidence for any mysterious nonlocal influences. Counterfactual reasoning can support a realistic interpretation of standard quantum theory (measurements reveal what is actually there) under appropriate circumstances.

Minor modifications to make it agree with published version. Latex 8 pages, 2 figures

References in corpus (1)

• Choice of Consistent Family, and Quantum Incompatibility

Cited by in corpus (14)

• Do we really understand quantum mechanics?
• Nonlocality Claims are Inconsistent with Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics
• Strange Weak Values
• What Quantum Measurements Measure
• Comparing Conditions for Macrorealism: Leggett-Garg Inequalities vs No-Signaling in Time
• Classical dynamics on graphs
• Quantum Measurements and Contextuality
• Quantum theory without Hilbert spaces
• Consistent Resolution of Some Relativistic Quantum Paradoxes
• The minimal length uncertainty and the nonextensive thermodynamics
• A Bayesian Account of Quantum Histories
• Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness
• Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics
• Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman