Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman
arXiv:2310.05968 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.056202
Abstract
This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)
arXiv commentAdded a reference to previous version so that it agrees with published version
References in corpus (8)
- Protocol for direct counterfactual quantum communication
- The past of a quantum particle
- Particle Path Through a Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer
- Consistent Quantum Counterfactuals
- Past of a quantum particle: Common sense prevails
- Comment on "Past of a quantum particle revisited"
- Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "
- Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual