Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "
arXiv:1901.05673 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.026104
Abstract
We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.
3 pages, 2 figures; this is our Reply to the Comment in arXiv:1805.12171v1
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Analysis of counterfactuality of counterfactual communication protocols
- Three approaches for analyzing the counterfactuality of counterfactual protocols
- Separating a particle's mass from its momentum
- Time-symmetry and topology of the Aharonov-Bohm effect
- Do neutrons disagree with photons about where they have been inside an interferometer?
- Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman