Do probabilistic medium-range temperature forecasts need to allow for non-normality?

Abstract

The gaussian spread regression model for the calibration of site specific ensemble temperature forecasts depends on the apparently restrictive assumption that the uncertainty around temperature forecasts is normally distributed. We generalise the model using the kernel density to allow for much more flexible distribution shapes. However, we do not find any meaningful improvement in the resulting probabilistic forecast when evaluated using likelihood based scores. We conclude that the distribution of uncertainty is either very close to normal, or if it is not close to normal, then the non-normality is not being predicted by the ensemble forecast that we test.

References in corpus (2)

• Moment based methods for ensemble assessment and calibration
• The Assessment and Calibration of Ensemble Seasonal Forecasts of Equatorial Pacific Ocean Temperature and the Predictability of Uncertainty

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Probabilistic temperature forecasting: a summary of our recent research results
• Improving probabilistic weather forecasts using seasonally varying calibration parameters
• Probabilistic forecasting of temperature: comments on the Bayesian Model Averaging approach
• Do medium range ensemble forecasts give useful predictions of temporal correlations?
• Probabilistic temperature forecasting: a comparison of four spread-regression models