Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle

Abstract

It was pointed out recently [A. Kent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2874] that the consistent histories approach allows contrary inferences to be made from the same data. These inferences correspond to projections $P$ and $Q$, belonging to different consistent sets, with the properties that $PQ=QP=0$ and $P\ne 1-Q$. To many, this seems undesirable in a theory of physical inferences. It also raises a specific problem for the consistent histories formalism, since that formalism is set up so as to eliminate contradictory inferences, i.e. inferences $P$ and $Q$ where $P=1-Q$. Yet there seems to be no sensible physical distinction between contradictory and contrary inferences. It seems particularly hard to defend the asymmetry, since (i) there is a well-defined quantum histories formalisms which admits both contradictory and contrary inferences, and (ii) there is also a well-defined formalism, based on ordered consistent sets of histories, which excludes both. In a recent comment, Griffiths and Hartle, while accepting the validity of the examples given in the above paper, restate their own preference for the consistent histories formalism. As this brief reply explains, in so doing, they fail to address the arguments made against their approach to quantum theory.

4 pages, TeX with harvmac; typo fixed. To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett

References in corpus (2)

• Comment on ``Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory''
• Quantum Histories

Cited by in corpus (16)

• Stochastic Gravity: Theory and Applications
• Stochastic Gravity: Theory and Applications
• Stochastic Theory of Relativistic Particles Moving in a Quantum Field: II. Scalar Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac-Langevin Equation, Radiation Reaction and Vacuum Fluctuations
• Stochastic Gravity: A Primer with Applications
• Completely Quantized Collapse and Consequences
• A Kinetic Theory Approach to Quantum Gravity
• Influence Action and decoherence of hydrodynamic modes
• First Principles Numerical Demonstration of Emergent Decoherent Histories
• Context, spacetime loops, and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Quantum histories without contrary inferences
• Epistemic Restrictions in Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics
• Incompatible Multiple Consistent Sets of Histories and Measures of Quantumness
• Possible Anthropic Support for a Decaying Universe: A Cosmic Doomsday Argument
• Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion
• Contrary Inferences for Classical Histories within the Consistent Histories Formulation of Quantum Theory
• The quantum mechanics needs the principle of wave function collapse, but this principle should not be misunderstood