Quantum Histories

Abstract

There are good motivations for considering some type of quantum histories formalism. Several possible formalisms are known, defined by different definitions of event and by different selection criteria for sets of histories. These formalisms have a natural interpretation, according to which nature somehow chooses one set of histories from among those allowed, and then randomly chooses to realise one history from that set; other interpretations are possible, but their scientific implications are essentially the same. The selection criteria proposed to date are reasonably natural, and certainly raise new questions. For example, the validity of ordering inferences which we normally take for granted --- such as that a particle in one region is necessarily in a larger region containing it --- depends on whether or not our history respects the criterion of ordered consistency, or merely consistency. However, the known selection criteria, including consistency and medium decoherence, are very weak. It is not possible to derive the predictions of classical mechanics or Copenhagen quantum mechanics from the theories they define, even given observational data in an extended time interval. Attempts to refine the consistent histories approach so as to solve this problem by finding a definition of quasiclassicality have so far not succeeded. On the other hand, it is shown that dynamical collapse models, of the type originally proposed by Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber, can be re-interpreted as set selection criteria within a quantum histories framework, in which context they appear as candidate solutions to the set selection problem. This suggests a new route to relativistic generalisation of these models, since covariant definitions of a quantum event are known.

19 pages, TeX with harvmac. Contribution to Proceedings of the 104th Nobel Symposium, ``Modern Studies of Basic Quantum Concepts and Phenomena'', Gimo, June 1997. To appear in Physica Scripta

Cited by in corpus (23)

• Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics
• Between classical and quantum
• Quantum Mereology: Factorizing Hilbert Space into Subsystems with Quasi-Classical Dynamics
• Completely Quantized Collapse and Consequences
• The Objective Past of a Quantum Universe: Redundant Records of Consistent Histories
• Universal Concept of Complexity by the Dynamic Redundance Paradigm: Causal Randomness, Complete Wave Mechanics, and the Ultimate Unification of Knowledge
• Objective trajectories in hybrid classical-quantum dynamics
• Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle
• Simulating causal collapse models
• Beable-Guided Quantum Theories: Generalising Quantum Probability Laws
• First Principles Numerical Demonstration of Emergent Decoherent Histories
• Dynamical Wave Function Collapse Models in Quantum Measure Theory
• A Consistent Quantum Ontology
• Quantum Measure Theory: A New Interpretation
• Consistent Quantum Measurements
• Night Thoughts of a Quantum Physicist
• Quantum Histories and Quantum Gravity
• Context, spacetime loops, and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
• A Bayesian Account of Quantum Histories
• Compatible Quantum Theory
• Possible Anthropic Support for a Decaying Universe: A Cosmic Doomsday Argument
• Epistemic Restrictions in Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics
• Worlds in the Everett Interpretation