paper

Mutual Constraints Between Reionization Models and Parameter Extraction From Cosmic Microwave Background Data

arXiv:astro-ph/0109129 · doi:10.1086/340297

Abstract

Spectroscopic studies of high-redshift objects and increasingly precise data on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are beginning to independently place strong complementary bounds on the epoch of hydrogen reionization. Parameter estimation from current CMB data continues, however, to be subject to several degeneracies. Here, we focus on those degeneracies in CMB parameter forecasts related to the optical depth to reionization. We extend earlier work on the mutual constraints that such analyses of CMB data and a reionization model may place on each other to a more general parameter set, and to the case of data anticipated from the satellite. We focus in particular on a semi-analytic model of reionization by the first stars, although the methods here are easily extended to other reionization scenarios. A reionization model can provide useful complementary information for cosmological parameter (CP) extraction from the CMB, particularly for the degeneracies between the optical depth and either of the amplitude and index of the primordial scalar power spectrum, which are still present in the most recent data. Alternatively, by using a reionization model, known limits on astrophysical quantities can reduce the forecasted errors on CPs. Forthcoming CMB data also have the potential to constrain the sites of early star formation, as well as the fraction of baryons that participate in it. Finally, we examine the implications of an independent, e.g., spectroscopic, determination of the epoch of reionization for the determination of CPs from the CMB. This has the potential to significantly strengthen limits from the CMB on parameters such as the index of the power spectrum, while having the considerable advantage of being free of the choice of the reionization model (abridged).

Accepted on 15 Feb. 2002 for publication in ApJ, 22 pages with 4 figures; paper's text expanded significantly, new Discussion section, results (table and figures) unchanged from version 1

References in corpus (12)

Cited by in corpus (13)