Network Inequality through Preferential Attachment, Triadic Closure, and Homophily
arXiv:2509.23205 · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-42911-3
Abstract
Inequalities in social networks arise from linking mechanisms, such as preferential attachment (connecting to popular nodes), homophily (connecting to similar others), and triadic closure (connecting through mutual contacts). While preferential attachment mainly drives degree inequality and homophily drives segregation, their three-way interaction remains understudied. This gap limits our understanding of how network inequalities emerge. Here, we introduce PATCH, a network growth model combining the three mechanisms to understand how they create disparities among two groups in synthetic networks. Extensive simulations confirm that homophily and preferential attachment increase segregation and degree inequalities, while triadic closure has countervailing effects: conditional on the other mechanisms, it amplifies population-wide degree inequality while reducing segregation and between-group degree disparities. We demonstrate PATCH's explanatory potential on fifty years of Physics and Computer Science collaboration and citation networks exhibiting persistent gender disparities. PATCH accounts for these gender disparities with the joint presence of preferential attachment, moderate gender homophily, and varying levels of triadic closure. By connecting mechanisms to observed inequalities, PATCH shows how their interplay sustains group disparities and provides a framework for designing interventions that promote more equitable social networks.
References in corpus (20)
- Emergence of scaling in random networks
- The structure of scientific collaboration networks
- Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks
- Growing Scale-Free Networks with Tunable Clustering
- Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines
- The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists
- Triadic closure as a basic generating mechanism of communities in complex networks
- Homophily and minority size explain perception biases in social networks
- Inequality is rising where social network segregation interacts with urban topology
- The Chaperone Effect in Scientific Publishing
- Visibility of minorities in social networks
- Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists
- Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks
- Triadic closure dynamics drives scaling-laws in social multiplex networks
- An extended formalism for preferential attachment in heterogeneous complex networks
- Inequality and Inequity in Network-based Ranking and Recommendation Algorithms
- First-mover advantage explains gender disparities in physics citations
- Improving the visibility of minorities through network growth interventions
- Assortative and preferential attachment lead to core-periphery networks
- On the Effect of Triadic Closure on Network Segregation