Improving the visibility of minorities through network growth interventions

Abstract

Improving the position of minorities in networks via interventions is a challenge of high theoretical and societal importance. In this work, we examine how different network growth interventions impact the position of minority nodes in degree rankings over time. We distinguish between two kinds of interventions: (i) group size interventions, such as introducing quotas, that regulate the ratio of incoming minority and majority nodes; and (ii) behavioural interventions, such as homophily, i.e. varying how groups interact and connect to each other. We find that even extreme group size interventions do not have a strong effect on the position of minorities in rankings if certain behavioural changes do not manifest at the same time. For example, minority representation in rankings is not increased by high quotas if the actors in the network do not adopt homophilic behaviour. As a result, a key finding of our research is that in order for the visibility of minorities to improve, group size and behavioural interventions need to be coordinated. Moreover, their potential benefit is highly dependent on pre-intervention conditions in social networks. In a real-world case study, we explore the effectiveness of interventions to reach gender parity in academia. Our work lays a theoretical and computational foundation for further studies aiming to explore the effectiveness of interventions in growing networks.

References in corpus (10)

• Emergence of scaling in random networks
• Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks
• The Majority Illusion in Social Networks
• Modern temporal network theory: A colloquium
• Causality-Driven Slow-Down and Speed-Up of Diffusion in Non-Markovian Temporal Networks
• Homophily and minority size explain perception biases in social networks
• Visibility of minorities in social networks
• Inferring Gender from Names on the Web: A Comparative Evaluation of Gender Detection Methods
• Inequality and Inequity in Network-based Ranking and Recommendation Algorithms
• First-mover advantage explains gender disparities in physics citations

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Intersectional inequalities in social networks
• Network Inequality through Preferential Attachment, Triadic Closure, and Homophily