First-mover advantage explains gender disparities in physics citations

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that publications and citations of scholars in the STEM fields (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) suffer from gender biases. In this paper, we study the physics community, a core STEM field in which women are still largely underrepresented and where these gender disparities persist. To reveal such inequalities, we compare the citations received by papers led by men and women that cover the same topics in a comparable way. To do that, we devise a robust statistical measure of similarity between publications that enables us to detect pairs of similar papers. Our findings indicate that although papers written by women tend to have lower visibility in the citation network, pairs of similar papers written by men and women receive comparable attention when corrected for the time of publication. These analyses suggest that gender disparity is closely related to the first-mover and cumulative advantage that men have in physics, and is not an intentional act of discrimination towards women.

21 pages, 8 tables, 10 figures

References in corpus (3)

• The many facets of academic mobility and its impact on scholars' career
• A consistent thermodynamic treatment for quark mass density-dependent model
• Improved quark mass density- dependent model with quark-sigma meson and quark-omega meson couplings

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice
• Improving the visibility of minorities through network growth interventions
• Assortative and preferential attachment lead to core-periphery networks
• Uniqueness Analysis of Controllability Scores and Their Application to Brain Networks
• Network Inequality through Preferential Attachment, Triadic Closure, and Homophily