Are all models wrong? Falsifying binary formation models in gravitational-wave astronomy

Abstract

As the catalogue of gravitational-wave transients grows, several entries appear "exceptional" within the population. Tipping the scales with a total mass of $\approx 150M_{\odot }$, GW190521 likely contained black holes in the pair-instability mass gap. The event GW190814, meanwhile, is unusual for its extreme mass ratio and the mass of its secondary component. A growing model-building industry has emerged to provide explanations for such exceptional events, and Bayesian model selection is frequently used to determine the most informative model. However, Bayesian methods can only take us so far. They provide no answer to the question: does our model provide an adequate explanation for the data? If none of the models we are testing provide an adequate explanation, then it is not enough to simply rank our existing models - we need new ones. In this paper, we introduce a method to answer this question with a frequentist $p$-value. We apply the method to different models that have been suggested to explain GW190521: hierarchical mergers in active galactic nuclei and globular clusters. We show that some (but not all) of these models provide adequate explanations for exceptionally massive events like GW190521.

11 pages, 5 figures, 1 table

References in corpus (47)

• Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector
• Advanced LIGO
• dynesty: A Dynamic Nested Sampling Package for Estimating Bayesian Posteriors and Evidences
• GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M${}_{\odot }$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M${}_{\odot }$ Compact Object
• GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run
• GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of $150M_{\odot }$
• Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy
• Pulsational Pair-Instability Supernovae
• Pulsational pair instability as an explanation for the most luminous supernovae
• KAGRA: 2.5 Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector
• An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models
• The Effect of Pair-Instability Mass Loss on Black Hole Mergers
• Mind the gap: The location of the lower edge of the pair instability supernovae black hole mass gap
• Black Holes: The Next Generation -- Repeated Mergers in Dense Star Clusters and their Gravitational-Wave Properties
• GW190521: orbital eccentricity and signatures of dynamical formation in a binary black hole merger signal
• The Evolution of Massive Helium Stars Including Mass Loss
• Towards models of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: A simple approximate mapping between precessing and non-precessing inspiral signals
• AGN as Potential Factories for Eccentric Black Hole Mergers
• The Pair-Instability Mass Gap for Black Holes
• Formation of GW190521 from stellar evolution: the impact of the hydrogen-rich envelope, dredge-up and ${}^{12}$C($\alpha$, $\gamma$)${}^{16}$O rate on the pair-instability black hole mass gap
• Hierarchical black hole mergers in young, globular and nuclear star clusters: the effect of metallicity, spin and cluster properties
• Evidence for hierarchical black hole mergers in the second LIGO--Virgo gravitational-wave catalog
• The GW190521 Mass Gap Event and the Primordial Black Hole Scenario
• Mass-gap Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei
• Black hole genealogy: Identifying hierarchical mergers with gravitational waves
• Hierarchical Black-Hole Mergers in Multiple Systems: Constrain the Formation of GW190412, GW190814 and GW190521-like events
• On the Origin of GW190521-like events from repeated black hole mergers in star clusters
• Monte Carlo Simulations of Globular Cluster Evolution. V. Binary Stellar Evolution
• A Parallel Monte Carlo Code for Simulating Collisional N-body Systems
• The Most Massive Binary Black Hole Detections and the Identification of Population Outliers
• Population III Binary Black Holes: Effects of Convective Overshooting on Formation of GW190521
• Do LIGO/Virgo black hole mergers produce AGN flares? The case of GW190521 and prospects for reaching a confident association
• Formation of Binary Black Holes Similar to GW190521 with a Total Mass of $\sim 150M_{\odot }$ from Population III Binary Star Evolution
• Formation of GW190521 via gas accretion onto Population III stellar black hole remnants born in high-redshift minihalos
• Confronting the primordial black hole scenario with the gravitational-wave events detected by LIGO-Virgo
• Does Matter Matter? Using the mass distribution to distinguish neutron stars and black holes
• The Population III origin of GW190521
• Breaching the limit: formation of GW190521-like and IMBH mergers in young massive clusters
• Measuring the properties of active galactic nuclei disks with gravitational waves
• When models fail: an introduction to posterior predictive checks and model misspecification in gravitational-wave astronomy
• Probing Extremal Gravitational-Wave Events with Coarse-Grained Likelihoods
• GW190521 formation via three-body encounters in young massive star clusters
• Model exploration in gravitational-wave astronomy with the maximum population likelihood
• Gravitational wave source populations: Disentangling an AGN component
• Repeated mergers of black hole binaries: implications for GW190521
• One to many: comparing single gravitational-wave events to astrophysical populations
• The distribution of Bayes' ratio

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation