Oscillating dark energy in light of the latest observations and its impact on the Hubble tension

Abstract

In this paper we have performed a comparative study of different types of oscillating dark energy models using the Metropolis algorithm of MCMC. Eight different oscillating parameterization being examined herein which have demonstrated considerable ability to fit the overall cosmological observations including Pantheon sample of SnIa, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Cosmic Chronometer Hubble data and distance priors of Planck CMB. In order to compare the consistency of these models with observations, we have used both Akaike and Deviation information criteria. Although, the values of Akaike information criteria for different models indicate that there is no support for oscillating DE models, Deviation information criteria showed that there is significant support for some of these models. Our results showed that these models are capable of solving cosmic coincidence problem and alleviating the Hubble tension. Comparing the $H_0$ values obtained for different oscillating scenarios, with that of $\Lambda$CDM, we observe that our oscillating models led to $\overline{H_0}=69.78$ which is $0.29$ greater than $H_{0,\Lambda }$ and thus reduce the Hubble tension. Among all of models, Model(1) with $H_0=70.00\pm 0.71$ is the most capable of alleviating the $H_0$ tension. Furthermore, we examined our models assuming $H_0=73.0\pm 1.4$ from SHoES measurements. We find that adding this data point to our data combination, led to a $\Delta \overline{H_0}=0.95$ increase in $H_0$ value for different models.

arXiv comment11 pages, 2 tables and 4 figures, Submitted in APJ

References in corpus (63)

• The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed Type Ia Supernovae from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from The Combined Pantheon Sample
• Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
• A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
• Constraints on the redshift dependence of the dark energy potential
• A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter at $z\sim 0.45$: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration
• H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of $H_0$ from lensed quasars: $5.3\sigma$ tension between early and late-Universe probes
• Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I: H(z) Measurements
• Information criteria for astrophysical model selection
• Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z$\sim$2
• Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z~1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers
• The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch
• Cosmic Distances Calibrated to 1% Precision with Gaia EDR3 Parallaxes and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry of 75 Milky Way Cepheids Confirm Tension with LambdaCDM
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters
• Age-dating Luminous Red Galaxies observed with the Southern African Large Telescope
• Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the CMB
• TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
• Oscillating Quintom and the Recurrent Universe
• The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the power spectrum and bispectrum of the DR12 BOSS galaxies
• Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures
• Aspects of the cosmological "coincidence problem"
• Baryon acoustic oscillations from the complete SDSS-III Ly$\alpha$-quasar cross-correlation function at $z=2.4$
• Measurements of the E-Mode Polarization and Temperature-E-Mode Correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 Data
• A comparison of cosmological models using recent supernova data
• Distance Priors from Planck Final Release
• Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Mira Variables in the Type Ia Supernova Host NGC 1559: An Alternative Candle to Measure the Hubble Constant
• The $H_0$ tension in light of vacuum dynamics in the Universe
• The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: structure growth rate measurement from the anisotropic quasar power spectrum in the redshift range $0.8<z<2.2$
• Complete Cosmic History with a dynamical Lambda(H) term
• Brans-Dicke gravity with a cosmological constant smoothes out $\Lambda$CDM tensions
• Probing the dynamics of dark energy with novel parametrizations
• Running vacuum against the $H_0$ and ${\sigma }_8$ tensions
• Can dark energy be expressed as a power series of the Hubble parameter?
• Observational Constraints on Oscillating Dark-Energy Parametrizations
• Gamma-Ray Bursts, Quasars, Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae Ia: new statistical insights and cosmological constraints
• Structure formation in cosmologies with oscillating dark energy
• Equation of state of the running vacuum
• On Oscillating Dark Energy
• Comparison between different methods of model selection in cosmology
• Oscillations in the dark energy EoS: new MCMC lessons
• Chain Early Dark Energy: Solving the Hubble Tension and Explaining Today's Dark Energy
• A Bayesian comparison between $\Lambda$CDM and phenomenologically emergent dark energy models
• Evolution of Oscillating Scalar Fields as Dark Energy
• Running vacuum in QFT in FLRW spacetime: The dynamics of ${\rho }_{\mathrm{vac}}(H)$ from the quantized matter fields
• Can Holographic dark energy models fit the observational data?
• No H_0 Assistance from Assisted Quintessence
• Fourier-series expansion of the dark-energy equation of state
• Constraints on $f(T)$ Cosmology with Pantheon+
• Parameter Inference for Weak Lensing using Gaussian Processes and MOPED
• Cosmological consequences of a scalar field with oscillating equation of state: A possible solution to the fine-tuning and coincidence problems
• Running vacuum versus Holographic dark energy: a cosmographic comparison
• Observational constraints on the oscillating dark energy cosmologies
• Cosmological bounds on oscillating dark energy models
• Spherical collapse model in agegraphic dark energy cosmologies
• From model dynamics to oscillating dark energy parameterisation
• Structure formation in dark energy cosmologies described by PADE parameterization
• Cosmological consequences of a scalar field with oscillating equation of state. II. Oscillating scaling and chaotic accelerating solutions
• Cosmological consequences of a scalar field with oscillating equation of state. III. Unifying inflation with dark energy and small tensor-to-scalar ratio
• Cosmological consequences of a scalar field with oscillating equation of state. IV. Primordial nucleosynthesis and the deuterium problem
• Influence of the correlation prior on reconstruction of the dark energy equation of state
• Cosmology with Planck T-E correlation coefficient
• A Bayesian Monte Carlo assessment of orbital stability in the late stages of planetary system formation

Cited by in corpus (14)

• An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy
• Dynamical dark energy confronted with multiple CMB missions
• Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Models with $\Lambda$ as an Equilibrium Point
• Testing an oscillatory behavior of dark energy
• Dark Energy within the Generalized Uncertainty Principle in Light of DESI DR2
• Cosmographic Footprints of Dynamical Dark Energy
• Unexplored regions in teleparallel $f(T)$ gravity: Sign-changing dark energy density
• Shape of Dark Energy: Constraining Its Evolution with a General Parametrization
• Constraining deviations from $\Lambda$CDM in the Hubble expansion rate
• Beyond Two Parameters: Revisiting Dark Energy with the Latest Cosmic Probes
• Revisiting CPL with sign-switching density: To cross or not to cross the NECB
• Dynamical Oscillations in Dark Energy: Joint Constraints on the $w_{sin}$CDM Model from DESI, OHD, and Supernova Samples
• Is Dark Energy Changing? Probing the Universe's Expansion with present and future astronomical probes
• Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model