A UNIONS view of the brightest central galaxies of candidate fossil groups

Abstract

The formation process of fossil groups (FGs) is still under debate, and large samples of such objects are still missing. The aim of this paper is to increase the sample of known FGs, and to analyse the properties of their brightest group galaxies (BGG) and compare them with a control sample of non-FG BGGs. Based on the Tinker spectroscopic catalogue of haloes and galaxies, we extract 87 FG and 100 non-FG candidates. For all the objects with data available in UNIONS in the u and r bands, and/or in an extra r-band processed to preserve all low surface brightness features (rLSB), we made a 2D photometric fit of the BGG with GALFIT with one or two Sersic components and analysed how the subtraction of intracluster light contribution modifies the BGG properties. From the SDSS spectra available for the BGGs of 65 FGs and 82 non-FGs, we extracted the properties of their stellar populations with Firefly. We also investigated the origin of the emission lines in a nearby FG, NGC 4104, that has an AGN. A single Sersic profile can fit most objects in the u band, while two Sersics are needed in the r and rLSB bands, both for FGs and non-FGs. Non-FG BGGs cover a larger range of Sersic index. FG BGGs follow the Kormendy relation derived for almost one thousand brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) by Chu et al. (2022) while non-FGs BGGs are mostly located below this relation, suggesting that FG BGGs have evolved similarly to BCGs, while non-FG BGGs have evolved differently. The above properties can be strongly modified by the subtraction of intracluster light contribution. The stellar populations of FG and non-FG BGGs do not differ significantly. Our results suggest FG and non-FG BGGs have had different formation histories, but it is not possible to trace differences in their stellar populations or large scale distributions.

arXiv commentAccepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics

References in corpus (35)

• The Host Galaxies of AGN
• Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images
• A Simple Model for the Absorption of Starlight by Dust in Galaxies
• Accurate photometric redshifts for the CFHT Legacy Survey calibrated using the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey
• Inferring the star-formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: Evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms
• A Halo-Based Galaxy Group Finder: Calibration and Application to the 2dFGRS
• The Atlas3D project -- XXIX. The new look of early-type galaxies and surrounding fields disclosed by extremely deep optical images
• The nature and space density of fossil groups of galaxies
• The Cosmic BPT Diagram: Confronting Theory with Observations
• Firefly (Fitting IteRativEly For Likelihood analYsis): a full spectral fitting code
• The Bright SHARC Survey: The Cluster Catalog
• The Formation of Fossil Galaxy Groups in the hierarchical Universe
• X-ray Over-Luminous Elliptical Galaxies: A New Class of Mass Concentrations in the Universe?
• The XXL Survey XX: The 365 cluster catalogue
• The Mass Assembly of Fossil Groups of Galaxies in the Millennium Simulation
• Assessing Colour-dependent Occupation Statistics Inferred from Galaxy Group Catalogues
• The Fossil Phase in the Life of a Galaxy Group
• The star formation histories of z~1 post-starburst galaxies
• Fossil Groups in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Unveiling the dynamical state of massive clusters through the ICL fraction
• On the Nature of Fossil Galaxy Groups: Are they really fossils ?
• A Self-Calibrating Halo-Based Group Finder: Application to SDSS
• The Formation of Bulges, Discs and Two Component Galaxies in the CANDELS Survey at z < 3
• Fossil Groups Origins III. The relation between optical and X-ray luminosities
• Evolution of the cluster optical galaxy luminosity function in the CFHTLS : breaking the degeneracy between mass and redshift
• DAWIS, a Detection Algorithm with Wavelets for Intracluster light Studies
• Physical properties of Brightest Cluster Galaxies up to redshift 1.80 based on HST data
• A Tale of a Tail: A Tidally-Disrupting Ultra-Diffuse Galaxy in the M81 Group
• Investigating the cores of fossil systems with Chandra
• Constraining the scatter in the galaxy-halo connection at Milky Way masses
• Disturbed Fossil Group Galaxy NGC 1132
• Physical properties of more than one thousand brightest cluster galaxies detected in the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey
• NGC 4104: a shell galaxy in a forming fossil group
• Fossil group origins XII. Large-scale environment around fossil systems
• Candidate fossil groups in the CFHTLS: a probabilistic approach

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Fossil group origins XIII. A paradigm shift: fossil groups as isolated structures rather than relics of the ancient Universe
• Galaxies OBserved as Low-luminosity Identified Nebulae (GOBLIN): a catalog of 43,000 high-probability dwarf galaxy candidates in the UNIONS survey
• The intracluster light analysis of the most evolved systems of galaxies: fossil groups
• Galaxy groups in various evolutionary stages