Physical properties of Brightest Cluster Galaxies up to redshift 1.80 based on HST data
arXiv:2102.01557 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040245
Abstract
Brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) have grown by accreting numerous smaller galaxies and can be used as tracers of cluster formation and evolution in the cosmic web. However, there is still a controversy on the main epoch of formation of BCGs, since some authors believe they have already formed before redshift z=2, while others still find them to evolve at more recent epochs. We aim to analyse the physical properties of a large sample of BCGs covering a wide redshift range up to z=1.8 and analysed in a homogeneous way, to see if their characteristics vary with redshift. As a first step, we also present a new tool to define for each cluster which galaxy is the BCG. For a sample of 137 clusters with HST images in the optical and/or infrared, we analyse the BCG properties by applying GALFIT with one or two Sersic components. For each BCG, we compute the Sersic index, effective radius, major axis position angle, surface brightness. We then search for correlations of these quantities with redshift. We find that BCGs follow the Kormendy relation (between the effective radius and the mean surface brightness), with a slope that remains constant with redshift, but with a variation with redshift of the ordinate at the origin. Although the trends are faint, we find that both the absolute magnitudes and effective radii tend to become respectively brighter and bigger with decreasing redshift. On the other hand, we find no significant correlation of the mean surface brightnesses or Sersic indices with redshift. The major axes of the cluster elongations and of the BCGs agree within 30 degrees for 73% of our clusters at redshift z <= 0.9. Our results agree with the BCGs being mainly formed before redshift z=2. The alignment of the major axes of BCGs with their clusters agree with the general idea that BCGs form at the same time as clusters by accreting matter along the filaments of the cosmic web.
Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics
References in corpus (30)
- The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
- CLASH: The Concentration-Mass Relation of Galaxy Clusters
- Brightest Cluster Galaxies at the Present Epoch
- The evolution of the brightest cluster galaxies since z~1 from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS)
- The Cluster Mass Function from Weak Gravitational Lensing
- Evolution in the structural properties of early-type Brightest Cluster Galaxies at small lookback time and dependence on the environment
- CoMaLit III. Literature Catalogs of weak Lensing Clusters of galaxies (LC^2)
- Ultraviolet Morphologies and Star-Formation Rates of CLASH Brightest Cluster Galaxies
- Evidence for the inside-out growth of the stellar mass distribution in galaxy clusters since z~1
- Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations between Bolocam Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and Chandra X-ray Measurements
- The Growth of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and Intracluster Light Over the Past Ten Billion Years
- Chandra X-ray Observations of the 0.6 < z < 1.1 Red-Sequence Cluster Survey Sample
- The Formation of Bulges, Discs and Two Component Galaxies in the CANDELS Survey at z < 3
- Chandra deep observation of XDCP J0044.0-2033, a massive galaxy cluster at z>1.5
- Shapes and alignments of dark matter haloes and their brightest cluster galaxies in 39 strong lensing clusters
- The Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey. III. Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Masses of Galaxy Clusters at
- Clocking the formation of today's largest galaxies: Wide field integral spectroscopy of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and their surroundings
- Ten Billion Years of Brightest Cluster Galaxy Alignments
- The Morphology-Density relationship in 1<z<2 clusters
- On the relation between mini-halos and AGN feedback in clusters of galaxies
- An imaging survey of a uniform sample of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and Intracluster Light
- Brightest Cluster Galaxies: the centre can(not?) hold
- The Dust and Molecular Gas in the Brightest Cluster Galaxy in MACS 1931.8-2635
- Evolution and Role of Mergers in the BCG-Cluster Alignment. A View from Cosmological Hydro-Simulations
- The Inside-out Growth of the Most Massive Galaxies at 0.3<z<0.9
- The Evolution of Brightest Cluster Galaxies in the Nearby Universe I: Colours and Stellar Masses from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and Wide Infrared Survey Explorer
- Multiwavelength investigations of co-evolution of bright custer galaxies
- First Weak-lensing Results from "See Change": Quantifying Dark Matter in the Two Z>1.5 High-redshift Galaxy Clusters SPT-CL J2040-4451 and IDCS J1426+3508
- The submillimetre view of massive clusters at z~0.8-1.6
- The link between brightest cluster galaxy properties and large scale extensions of 38 DAFT/FADA and CLASH clusters in the redshift range 0.2<z<0.9
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Jellyfish galaxy candidates in MACS J0717.5+3745 and thirty-nine other clusters of the DAFT/FADA and CLASH surveys
- Extending empirical constraints on the SZ-mass scaling relation to higher redshifts via HST weak lensing measurements of nine clusters from the SPT-SZ survey at
- Death at watersheds: galaxy quenching in low-density environments
- Intracluster light in the core of z~2 galaxy proto-clusters
- Physical properties of more than one thousand brightest cluster galaxies detected in the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey
- The alignment between brightest cluster galaxies and host clusters
- Off-centre supermassive black holes in bright central galaxies
- A UNIONS view of the brightest central galaxies of candidate fossil groups
- Star forming brightest cluster galaxies at in KiDS. Further studies of cold gas and stellar properties
- Age-Divided Mean Stellar Populations from Full Spectrum Fitting as the Simplified Star Formation and Chemical Evolution History of a Galaxy: Methodology and Reliability
- Structural Analysis of Brightest Cluster Galaxies in Poor and Rich Clusters
- The Kormendy relation of cluster galaxies in PPS regions
- The Journey to Dominance: How BCGs Evolve Differently from Other Massive Galaxies