Impact of phylogeny on structural contact inference from protein sequence data

Abstract

Local and global inference methods have been developed to infer structural contacts from multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins. They rely on correlations in amino-acid usage at contacting sites. Because homologous proteins share a common ancestry, their sequences also feature phylogenetic correlations, which can impair contact inference. We investigate this effect by generating controlled synthetic data from a minimal model where the importance of contacts and of phylogeny can be tuned. We demonstrate that global inference methods, specifically Potts models, are more resilient to phylogenetic correlations than local methods, based on covariance or mutual information. This holds whether or not phylogenetic corrections are used, and may explain the success of global methods. We analyse the roles of selection strength and of phylogenetic relatedness. We show that sites that mutate early in the phylogeny yield false positive contacts. We consider natural data and realistic synthetic data, and our findings generalise to these cases. Our results highlight the impact of phylogeny on contact prediction from protein sequences and illustrate the interplay between the rich structure of biological data and inference.

arXiv comment31 pages, 19 figures, 3 tables

References in corpus (17)

• Direct-coupling analysis of residue co-evolution captures native contacts across many protein families
• Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing
• Improved contact prediction in proteins: Using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models
• Coevolutionary landscape inference and the context-dependence of mutations in beta-lactamase TEM-1
• Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences
• Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences
• How pairwise coevolutionary models capture the collective residue variability in proteins
• Simultaneous identification of specifically interacting paralogs and inter-protein contacts by Direct-Coupling Analysis
• Protein language models trained on multiple sequence alignments learn phylogenetic relationships
• Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences using mutual information
• Phylogenetic correlations can suffice to infer protein partners from sequences
• Direct Coupling Analysis of Epistasis in Allosteric Materials
• Correlations from structure and phylogeny combine constructively in the inference of protein partners from sequences
• Combining phylogeny and coevolution improves the inference of interaction partners among paralogous proteins
• Statistical physics of interacting proteins: impact of dataset size and quality assessed in synthetic sequences
• Inferring couplings in networks across order-disorder phase transitions
• Impact of phylogeny on structural contact inference from protein sequence data

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Generative power of a protein language model trained on multiple sequence alignments
• Impact of phylogeny on structural contact inference from protein sequence data
• Impact of phylogeny on the inference of functional sectors from protein sequence data