Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentation

Abstract

Deep learning models for natural language processing (NLP) are increasingly adopted and deployed by analysts without formal training in NLP or machine learning (ML). However, the documentation intended to convey the model's details and appropriate use is tailored primarily to individuals with ML or NLP expertise. To address this gap, we conduct a design inquiry into interactive model cards, which augment traditionally static model cards with affordances for exploring model documentation and interacting with the models themselves. Our investigation consists of an initial conceptual study with experts in ML, NLP, and AI Ethics, followed by a separate evaluative study with non-expert analysts who use ML models in their work. Using a semi-structured interview format coupled with a think-aloud protocol, we collected feedback from a total of 30 participants who engaged with different versions of standard and interactive model cards. Through a thematic analysis of the collected data, we identified several conceptual dimensions that summarize the strengths and limitations of standard and interactive model cards, including: stakeholders; design; guidance; understandability & interpretability; sensemaking & skepticism; and trust & safety. Our findings demonstrate the importance of carefully considered design and interactivity for orienting and supporting non-expert analysts using deep learning models, along with a need for consideration of broader sociotechnical contexts and organizational dynamics. We have also identified design elements, such as language, visual cues, and warnings, among others, that support interactivity and make non-interactive content accessible. We summarize our findings as design guidelines and discuss their implications for a human-centered approach towards AI/ML documentation.

To appear at ACM FAccT'22

References in corpus (7)

• Array Programming with NumPy
• Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
• Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making
• Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairness
• Explainability Fact Sheets: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable Approaches
• Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and Needs
• Fits and Starts: Enterprise Use of AutoML and the Role of Humans in the Loop