activity
20162026
most citedInteractive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentation

101 citations · 475 across the 37 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

44 papers

cs.CR2026

CWE-bench: Refocusing Agentic Security from Exploitation to Defense

Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Ajay Jagannath, Adit Jain +3

Cybersecurity evaluations of AI agents have focused largely on offense, yet a working exploit does not show that an agent can make software safe. An attacker needs to exploit only…

cs.CL2026

: Benchmarking AI Agents for Long-Term Planning and Consistent Execution

Muyu He, Adit Jain, Anand Kumar +4

As LLM agents tackle increasingly complex tasks, a critical question is whether they can maintain strategic coherence over long horizons: planning under uncertainty, learning from…

cs.CL2025

The Valley of Code Reasoning: Scaling Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Models

Muyu He, Muhammad Ali Shafique, Anand Kumar +2

Distilling the thinking traces of a Large Language Model (LLM) with reasoning capabilities into a smaller model has been proven effective. Yet, there is a scarcity of work done on…

cs.AI2025

Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents

Muyu He, Anand Kumar, Tsach Mackey +3

Despite rapid progress in building conversational AI agents, robustness is still largely untested. Small shifts in user behavior, such as being more impatient, incoherent, or skept…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Cats Confuse Reasoning LLM: Query Agnostic Adversarial Triggers for Reasoning Models

Meghana Rajeev, Rajkumar Ramamurthy, Prapti Trivedi +5

We investigate the robustness of reasoning models trained for step-by-step problem solving by introducing query-agnostic adversarial triggers - short, irrelevant text that, when ap…

cs.CL2024

VERITAS: A Unified Approach to Reliability Evaluation

Rajkumar Ramamurthy, Meghana Arakkal Rajeev, Oliver Molenschot +2

Large language models (LLMs) often fail to synthesize information from their context to generate an accurate response. This renders them unreliable in knowledge intensive settings…

cs.CL2024

Self-rationalization improves LLM as a fine-grained judge

Prapti Trivedi, Aditya Gulati, Oliver Molenschot +7

LLM-as-a-judge models have been used for evaluating both human and AI generated content, specifically by providing scores and rationales. Rationales, in addition to increasing tran…

cs.SE2024★ 5 cited

What's documented in AI? Systematic Analysis of 32K AI Model Cards

Weixin Liang, Nazneen Rajani, Xinyu Yang +5

The rapid proliferation of AI models has underscored the importance of thorough documentation, as it enables users to understand, trust, and effectively utilize these models in var…

cs.LG2023★ 56 cited

Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment

Lewis Tunstall, Edward Beeching, Nathan Lambert +11

We aim to produce a smaller language model that is aligned to user intent. Previous research has shown that applying distilled supervised fine-tuning (dSFT) on larger models signif…

cs.CY2023★ 13 cited

Confidence-Building Measures for Artificial Intelligence: Workshop Proceedings

Sarah Shoker, Andrew Reddie, Sarah Barrington +20

Foundation models could eventually introduce several pathways for undermining state security: accidents, inadvertent escalation, unintentional conflict, the proliferation of weapon…

cs.AI2022★ 8 cited

Measuring Data

Margaret Mitchell, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Nathan Lambert +7

We identify the task of measuring data to quantitatively characterize the composition of machine learning data and datasets. Similar to an object's height, width, and volume, data…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

Are Hard Examples also Harder to Explain? A Study with Human and Model-Generated Explanations

Swarnadeep Saha, Peter Hase, Nazneen Rajani +1

Recent work on explainable NLP has shown that few-shot prompting can enable large pretrained language models (LLMs) to generate grammatical and factual natural language explanation…

cs.CL2022

BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model

BigScience Workshop, :, Teven Le Scao +391

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be able to perform new tasks based on a few demonstrations or natural language instructions. While these capabilities have led to wi…

cs.CL2022

Conformal Predictor for Improving Zero-shot Text Classification Efficiency

Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Yu Bai, Chien-Sheng Wu +2

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been shown effective for zero-shot (0shot) text classification. 0shot models based on natural language inference (NLI) and next sentence pre…

cs.CL2022★ 1 cited

SEAL : Interactive Tool for Systematic Error Analysis and Labeling

Nazneen Rajani, Weixin Liang, Lingjiao Chen +2

With the advent of Transformers, large language models (LLMs) have saturated well-known NLP benchmarks and leaderboards with high aggregate performance. However, many times these m…

cs.LG2022★ 5 cited

Evaluate & Evaluation on the Hub: Better Best Practices for Data and Model Measurements

Leandro von Werra, Lewis Tunstall, Abhishek Thakur +16

Evaluation is a key part of machine learning (ML), yet there is a lack of support and tooling to enable its informed and systematic practice. We introduce Evaluate and Evaluation o…

cs.HC2022★ 101 cited

Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentation

Anamaria Crisan, Margaret Drouhard, Jesse Vig +1

Deep learning models for natural language processing (NLP) are increasingly adopted and deployed by analysts without formal training in NLP or machine learning (ML). However, the d…

cs.HC2022★ 17 cited

iSEA: An Interactive Pipeline for Semantic Error Analysis of NLP Models

Jun Yuan, Jesse Vig, Nazneen Rajani

Error analysis in NLP models is essential to successful model development and deployment. One common approach for diagnosing errors is to identify subpopulations in the dataset whe…

cs.CL2021

P-Adapters: Robustly Extracting Factual Information from Language Models with Diverse Prompts

Benjamin Newman, Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Nazneen Rajani

Recent work (e.g. LAMA (Petroni et al., 2019)) has found that the quality of the factual information extracted from Large Language Models (LLMs) depends on the prompts used to quer…

cs.CL2021★ 2 cited

CaPE: Contrastive Parameter Ensembling for Reducing Hallucination in Abstractive Summarization

Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Alexander R. Fabbri, Jesse Vig +3

Hallucination is a known issue for neural abstractive summarization models. Recent work suggests that the degree of hallucination may depend on errors in the training data. In this…

cs.CL2021

HydraSum: Disentangling Stylistic Features in Text Summarization using Multi-Decoder Models

Tanya Goyal, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Wenhao Liu +1

Summarization systems make numerous "decisions" about summary properties during inference, e.g. degree of copying, specificity and length of outputs, etc. However, these are implic…

cs.CL2021★ 10 cited

Stage-wise Fine-tuning for Graph-to-Text Generation

Qingyun Wang, Semih Yavuz, Victoria Lin +2

Graph-to-text generation has benefited from pre-trained language models (PLMs) in achieving better performance than structured graph encoders. However, they fail to fully utilize t…

cs.CL2021★ 4 cited

BookSum: A Collection of Datasets for Long-form Narrative Summarization

Wojciech Kryściński, Nazneen Rajani, Divyansh Agarwal +2

The majority of available text summarization datasets include short-form source documents that lack long-range causal and temporal dependencies, and often contain strong layout and…

cs.CL2021

SummVis: Interactive Visual Analysis of Models, Data, and Evaluation for Text Summarization

Jesse Vig, Wojciech Kryściński, Karan Goel +1

Novel neural architectures, training strategies, and the availability of large-scale corpora haven been the driving force behind recent progress in abstractive text summarization.…