Zeno: An Interactive Framework for Behavioral Evaluation of Machine Learning

Abstract

Machine learning models with high accuracy on test data can still produce systematic failures, such as harmful biases and safety issues, when deployed in the real world. To detect and mitigate such failures, practitioners run behavioral evaluation of their models, checking model outputs for specific types of inputs. Behavioral evaluation is important but challenging, requiring that practitioners discover real-world patterns and validate systematic failures. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with ML practitioners to better understand the challenges of behavioral evaluation and found that it is a collaborative, use-case-first process that is not adequately supported by existing task- and domain-specific tools. Using these findings, we designed Zeno, a general-purpose framework for visualizing and testing AI systems across diverse use cases. In four case studies with participants using Zeno on real-world models, we found that practitioners were able to reproduce previous manual analyses and discover new systematic failures.

References in corpus (7)

• Predictive Inequity in Object Detection
• Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentation
• Discovering and Validating AI Errors With Crowdsourced Failure Reports
• Symphony: Composing Interactive Interfaces for Machine Learning
• Machine Learning Practices Outside Big Tech: How Resource Constraints Challenge Responsible Development
• Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddings
• Did the Model Change? Efficiently Assessing Machine Learning API Shifts