Interplay between risk perception, behaviour, and COVID-19 spread

Abstract

Pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been crucial for controlling COVID-19. They are complemented by voluntary health-protective behaviour, building a complex interplay between risk perception, behaviour, and disease spread. We studied how voluntary health-protective behaviour and vaccination willingness impact the long-term dynamics. We analysed how different levels of mandatory NPIs determine how individuals use their leeway for voluntary actions. If mandatory NPIs are too weak, COVID-19 incidence will surge, implying high morbidity and mortality before individuals react; if they are too strong, one expects a rebound wave once restrictions are lifted, challenging the transition to endemicity. Conversely, moderate mandatory NPIs give individuals time and room to adapt their level of caution, mitigating disease spread effectively. When complemented with high vaccination rates, this also offers a robust way to limit the impacts of the Omicron variant of concern. Altogether, our work highlights the importance of appropriate mandatory NPIs to maximise the impact of individual voluntary actions in pandemic control.

Final version after peer-review (version of record)

References in corpus (2)

• A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: an expert consultation
• Relaxing restrictions at the pace of vaccination increases freedom and guards against further COVID-19 waves

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Societal self-regulation induces complex infection dynamics and chaos
• Model-based assessment of sampling protocols for infectious disease genomic surveillance
• Memory Effects in Disease Modelling Through Kernel Estimates with Oscillatory Time History
• Recent trends in socio-epidemic modelling: behaviours and their determinants