◍wovepaper
SearchResearchersInstitutions
Sign in
quant-phOct 17, 2021
1
citations (OpenAlex)
authors
  • Blake C. Stacey
arXiv abstractPDF
paper

On Relationalist Reconstructions of Quantum Theory

arXiv:2109.03186

Abstract

Why I'm not happy with how Relational Quantum Mechanics has addressed the reconstruction of quantum theory, and why you shouldn't be either.

arXiv comment13 pages, 0 figures; v3: ~1 paragraph rewritten to asymptotically approach clarity, bibliography updated

References in corpus (17)

  • Relational Quantum Mechanics
  • In defense of the epistemic view of quantum states: a toy theory
  • Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms
  • Relational EPR
  • Quantum theory from questions
  • Introducing the Qplex: A Novel Arena for Quantum Theory
  • Making better sense of quantum mechanics
  • Niels Bohr as Philosopher of Experiment: Does Decoherence Theory Challenge Bohr's Doctrine of Classical Concepts?
  • QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero's Handbook
  • Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories
  • Qubits are not observers -- a no-go theorem
  • Born's rule as a quantum extension of Bayesian coherence
  • A critical look at strings
  • Strongly symmetric spectral convex bodies are Jordan algebra state spaces
  • Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics
  • From Einstein's 1905 Postulates to the Geometry of Flat Space-Time
  • Copenhagen Interpretation Delenda Est?

Cited by in corpus (1)

  • Relational Quantum Mechanics is about Facts, not States: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner
◍wovepaper

Papers, researchers and institutions, woven together.

Explore
  • Search
  • Researchers
  • Institutions
Account
  • Library
  • Chat
Data
  • arXiv.org
  • Semantic Scholar
  • OpenAlex
  • Latest RSS
AboutContactPrivacyDevelopersllms.txtopenapi.json
Not affiliated with arXiv. Researcher data from Semantic Scholar (ODC-BY) and OpenAlex.