Biases in orbit fitting of directly-imaged exoplanets with small orbital coverage

Abstract

The eccentricity of a planet's orbit and the inclination of its orbital plane encode important information about its formation and history. However, exoplanets detected via direct-imaging are often only observed over a very small fraction of their period, making it challenging to perform reliable physical inferences given wide, unconstrained posteriors. The aim of this project is to investigate biases (deviation of the median and mode of the posterior from the true values of orbital parameters, and the width and coverage of their credible intervals) in the estimation of orbital parameters of directly-imaged exoplanets, particularly their eccentricities, and to define general guidelines to perform better estimations of uncertainty. For this, we constructed various orbits and generated mock data for each spanning $\sim 0.5\%$ of the orbital period. We used the Orbits For The Impatient (OFTI) algorithm to compute orbit posteriors, and compared those to the true values of the orbital parameters. We found that the inclination of the orbital plane is the parameter that most affects our estimations of eccentricity, with orbits that appear near edge-on producing eccentricity distributions skewed away from the true values, and often bi-modal. We also identified a degeneracy between eccentricity and inclination that makes it difficult to distinguish posteriors of face-on, eccentric orbits and edge-on, circular orbits. For the exoplanet-imaging community, we propose practical recommendations, guidelines and warnings relevant to orbit-fitting.

22 pages, 10 figures. Accepted in The Astronomical Journal of the American Astronomical Society

References in corpus (12)

• The fast spin-rotation of a young extrasolar planet
• Population-Level Eccentricity Distributions of Imaged Exoplanets and Brown Dwarf Companions: Dynamical Evidence for Distinct Formation Channels
• orbitize!: A Comprehensive Orbit-fitting Software Package for the High-contrast Imaging Community
• The slow spin of the young sub-stellar companion GQ Lupi b and its orbital configuration
• The Orbit and Transit Prospects for $\beta$ Pictoris b constrained with One Milliarcsecond Astrometry
• Radial Velocity Measurements of HR 8799 b and c with Medium Resolution Spectroscopy
• Hint of curvature in the orbital motion of the exoplanet 51 Eridani b using 3 years of VLT/SPHERE monitoring
• Constraining the orbits of sub-stellar companions imaged over short orbital arcs
• Spin-orbit alignment of the $\beta$ Pictoris planetary system
• An updated visual orbit of the directly-imaged exoplanet 51 Eridani b and prospects for a dynamical mass measurement with Gaia
• Insights on the dynamical history of the Fomalhaut system - Investigating the Fom c hypothesis
• Frequentist confidence intervals for orbits

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Rotation Periods, Inclinations, and Obliquities of Cool Stars Hosting Directly Imaged Substellar Companions: Spin-Orbit Misalignments are Common
• Assessing the C/O Ratio Formation Diagnostic: A Potential Trend with Companion Mass
• The Impact of Bayesian Hyperpriors on the Population-Level Eccentricity Distribution of Imaged Planets
• A giant planet transiting a 3-Myr protostar with a misaligned disk
• Characterizing the protolunar disk of the accreting companion GQ Lupi B
• Octofitter: Fast, Flexible, and Accurate Orbit Modelling to Detect Exoplanets
• The Orbital Architecture of Qatar-6: A Fully Aligned 3-Body System?
• alpha-Deep Probabilistic Inference (alpha-DPI): efficient uncertainty quantification from exoplanet astrometry to black hole feature extraction
• An Edge-On Orbit for the Eccentric Long-Period Planet HR 5183 b
• Orbital Modeling of HII 1348B: An Eccentric Young Substellar Companion in the Pleiades