Heuristic Methods and Performance Bounds for Photonic Design
arXiv:2011.08002 · doi:10.1364/OE.415052
Abstract
In the photonic design problem, a scientist or engineer chooses the physical parameters of a device to best match some desired device behavior. Many instances of the photonic design problem can be naturally stated as a mathematical optimization problem that is computationally difficult to solve globally. Because of this, several heuristic methods have been developed to approximately solve such problems. These methods often produce very good designs, and, in many practical applications, easily outperform 'traditional' designs that rely on human intuition. Yet, because these heuristic methods do not guarantee that the approximate solution found is globally optimal, the question remains of just how much better a designer might hope to do. This question is addressed by performance bounds or impossibility results, which determine a performance level that no design can achieve. We focus on algorithmic performance bounds, which involve substantial computation to determine. We illustrate a variety of both heuristic methods and performance bounds on two examples. In these examples (and many others not reported here) the performance bounds show that the heuristic designs are nearly optimal, and can considered globally optimal in practice. This review serves to clearly set up the photonic design problem and unify existing approaches for calculating performance bounds, while also providing some natural generalizations and properties.
References in corpus (29)
- Outlook for inverse design in nanophotonics
- JuMP: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Optimization
- Training deep neural networks for the inverse design of nanophotonic structures
- Inverse design and demonstration of a compact and broadband on-chip wavelength demultiplexer
- Fundamental Limit of Nanophotonic Light-trapping in Solar Cells
- Global optimization of dielectric metasurfaces using a physics-driven neural network
- Adjoint method and inverse design for nonlinear nanophotonic devices
- High-NA Achromatic Metalenses by Inverse Design
- Nanophotonic Computational Design
- Inverse-designed photonic circuits for fully passive, bias-free Kerr-based nonreciprocal transmission and routing
- Inverse design of photonic crystals through automatic differentiation
- On-chip integrated laser-driven particle accelerator
- Topology optimization of freeform large-area metasurfaces
- Fundamental limits to optical response in absorptive systems
- Integrated Optical Devices Design by Genetic Algorithm
- Robust topology optimization of three-dimensional photonic-crystal band-gap structures
- Inverse designed metalenses with extended depth of focus
- Light Trapping Textures Designed by Electromagnetic Optimization for Sub-Wavelength Thick Solar Cells
- Genetic Optimization of Photonic Bandgap Structures
- Limits to the Optical Response of Graphene and 2D Materials
- Fundamental limits to near-field optical response, over any bandwidth
- Computational Bounds For Photonic Design
- Fundamental limits to radiative heat transfer: theory
- Inverse Design of Nanoparticles for Enhanced Raman Scattering
- The ultimate absorption at light scattering by a single obstacle
- Inverse-Designed Stretchable Metalens with Tunable Focal Distance
- Global operator bounds on electromagnetic scattering: Upper bounds on far-field cross sections
- -operator bounds on angle-integrated absorption and thermal radiation for arbitrary objects
- Fundamental bounds for scattering from absorptionless electromagnetic structures