Singling out modified gravity parameters and datasets reveals a dichotomy between Planck and lensing

Abstract

An important route to testing General Relativity (GR) at cosmological scales is usually done by constraining modified gravity (MG) parameters added to the Einstein perturbed equations. Most studies have analyzed so far constraints on pairs of MG parameters, but here, we explore constraints on one parameter at a time while fixing the other at its GR value. This allows us to analyze various models while benefiting from a stronger constraining power from the data. We also explore which specific datasets are in tension with GR. We find that models with ($\mu =1$, $\eta$) and ($\mu$, $\eta =1$) exhibit a 3.9-$\sigma$ and 3.8-$\sigma$ departure from GR when using Planck18+SNe+BAO, while ($\mu$, $\eta$) shows a tension of 3.4-$\sigma$. We find no tension with GR for models with the MG parameter $\Sigma$ fixed to its GR value. Using a Bayesian model selection analysis, we find that some one-parameter MG models are moderately favored over $\Lambda$CDM when using all dataset combinations except Planck CMB Lensing and DES data. Namely, Planck18 shows a moderate tension with GR that only increases when adding any combination of RSD, SNe, or BAO. However, adding lensing diminishes or removes these tensions, which can be attributed to the ability of lensing in constraining the MG parameter $\Sigma$. The two overall groups of datasets are found to have a dichotomy when performing consistency tests with GR, which may be due to systematic effects, lack of constraining power, or modelling. These findings warrant further investigation using more precise data from ongoing and future surveys.

11 pages, 6 figures. Matches the published version on 06/24/2021. A Python wrapper for the system ISiTGR is also released with this paper and available at https://github.com/mishakb/ISiTGR

References in corpus (12)

• Dynamics of dark energy
• Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM
• The Clustering of the SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample I: A 4 per cent Distance Measure at z=0.15
• Supernova Constraints and Systematic Uncertainties from the First 3 Years of the Supernova Legacy Survey
• Cosmic Microwave Weak lensing data as a test for the dark universe
• Cosmological discordances II: Hubble constant, Planck and large-scale-structure data sets
• MGCAMB with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy
• Primordial Gravitational Wave Signals in Modified Cosmologies
• Growth factor parametrization in curved space
• Challenges in Connecting Modified Gravity Theory and Observations
• Cosmological discordances III: more on measure properties, Large-Scale-Structure constraints, the Hubble constant and Planck
• The dynamics of the local group as a probe of Dark Energy and Modified Gravity

Cited by in corpus (5)

• DESI 2024 VII: Cosmological Constraints from the Full-Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements
• Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024
• New MGCAMB tests of gravity with CosmoMC and Cobaya
• Current constraints on deviations from General Relativity using binning in redshift and scale
• Exploring Modified Gravity: Constraints on the $\mu$ and $\Sigma$ Parametrization with WMAP, ACT, and SPT