Challenges in Connecting Modified Gravity Theory and Observations

Abstract

Cosmic acceleration may be due to modifications of cosmic gravity and to test this we need robust connections between theory and observations. However, in a model independent approach like effective field theory or a broad class like Horndeski gravity, several free functions of time enter the theory. We show that simple parametrizations of these functions are unlikely to be successful; in particular the approximation ${\alpha }_i(t)\propto {\Omega }_{\mathrm{de}}(t)$ drastically misestimates the observables. This holds even in simple modified gravity theories like $f(R)$. Indeed, oversimplified approximations to the property functions ${\alpha }_i(t)$ can even miss the signature of modified gravity. We also consider the question of consistency relations and the role of tensor (gravitational wave) perturbations.

10 pages, 5 figures; v2 new Appendix on f(R) with new figure; v3 accepted to PRD, new figure, reordering and clarification, conclusions unchanged

References in corpus (11)

• Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
• Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model
• Maximal freedom at minimum cost: linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity
• Distinguishing Modified Gravity from Dark Energy
• A unifying description of dark energy
• The observational status of Galileon gravity after Planck
• Calibrating Dark Energy
• Confronting General Relativity with Further Cosmological Data
• Fab 5: Noncanonical Kinetic Gravity, Self Tuning, and Cosmic Acceleration
• New Gravitational Scales in Cosmological Surveys
• Are Scalar and Tensor Deviations Related in Modified Gravity?