paper

Model Comparison of CDM vs using Cosmic Chronometers

arXiv:2003.00494 · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8289-8

Abstract

In 2012, Bilicki and Seikel (arXiv:1206.5130) showed that data reconstructed using Gaussian Process Regression from cosmic chronometers and BAO, conclusively rules out the model. These results were disputed by Melia and collaborators in two different works (arXiv:1304.1802 and arXiv:1802.02255), who showed using both an unbinned analysis and Gaussian Process reconstructed data from chronometers, that is favored over CDM model. To resolve this imbroglio, we carry out model comparison of CDM versus by independently reproducing the above claims using latest chronometer data. We perform model selection between these two models using Bayesian model comparison. We find that no one model between CDM and is decisively favored when uniform priors on CDM parameters are used. However, if we use priors centered around the Planck best-fit values, then CDM is very strongly preferred over .

9 pages, 3 figures

References in corpus (17)

Cited by in corpus (27)