Model Comparison of CDM vs using Cosmic Chronometers
arXiv:2003.00494 · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8289-8
Abstract
In 2012, Bilicki and Seikel (arXiv:1206.5130) showed that data reconstructed using Gaussian Process Regression from cosmic chronometers and BAO, conclusively rules out the model. These results were disputed by Melia and collaborators in two different works (arXiv:1304.1802 and arXiv:1802.02255), who showed using both an unbinned analysis and Gaussian Process reconstructed data from chronometers, that is favored over CDM model. To resolve this imbroglio, we carry out model comparison of CDM versus by independently reproducing the above claims using latest chronometer data. We perform model selection between these two models using Bayesian model comparison. We find that no one model between CDM and is decisively favored when uniform priors on CDM parameters are used. However, if we use priors centered around the Planck best-fit values, then CDM is very strongly preferred over .
9 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (17)
- Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z2
- Two new diagnostics of dark energy
- Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis After Planck
- Model independent evidence for dark energy evolution from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
- Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Bayesian Data Analysis in Astronomy
- Inflationary schism after Planck2013
- Cosmology and Convention
- A new null diagnostic customized for reconstructing the properties of dark energy from BAO data
- Strong evidence for an accelerating universe
- The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints
- We do not live in the R_h = c t universe
- Robust model comparison disfavors power law cosmology
- and the eternal coasting cosmological model
- Median statistics estimates of Hubble and Newton's Constant
- On Model Selection in Cosmology
- Testing the Universe Jointly with the Redshift-dependent Expansion rate and Angular-diameter and Luminosity Distances
- A Cosmological basis for E=mc^2
Cited by in corpus (27)
- Eppur è piatto? The cosmic chronometer take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
- Paramerization of deceleration parameter in gravity
- Neural Network Reconstruction of Late-Time Cosmology and Null Tests
- Investigating the dark energy phenomenon in cosmological models with observational constraints
- A test of cosmic distance duality relation using SPT-SZ galaxy clusters, Type Ia supernovae, and cosmic chronometers
- Neural network reconstructions for the Hubble parameter, growth rate and distance modulus
- A search for the variation of speed of light using galaxy cluster gas mass fraction measurements
- Search for Lorentz Invariance Violation from stacked Gamma-Ray Burst spectral lag data
- A null test of the Cosmological Principle with BAO measurements
- A test of the standard dark matter density evolution law using galaxy clusters and cosmic chronometers
- New cosmological constraints on the evolution of dark matter energy density
- Low redshift calibration of the Amati relation using galaxy clusters
- Astrophysical and Cosmological Searches for Lorentz Invariance Violation
- Constraining deviations from CDM in the Hubble expansion rate
- A model-independent test of the evolution of gas depletion factor for SPT-SZ and Planck ESZ clusters
- Resolving FLRW cosmology through effective equations of state in gravity
- Classification of Pulsar Glitch Amplitudes using Extreme Deconvolution
- Search for Lorentz Invariance Violation using Bayesian model comparison applied to Xiao et al. GRB spectral lag catalog
- A test of the evolution of gas depletion factor in galaxy clusters using strong gravitational lensing systems
- Parameterized Deceleration in Gravity: A Logarithmic Approach
- The Hubble constant from galaxy cluster scaling-relation and SNe Ia observations: a consistency test
- Galaxy clusters, cosmic chronometers and the Einstein equivalence principle
- Bayesian Analysis of time dependence of DAMA annual modulation amplitude
- A comparison of cosmological models with high-redshift quasars
- Comparison of CDM and with updated galaxy cluster measurements using Bayesian inference
- Bayesian Model Comparison of versus CDM using HII galaxy Hubble diagram
- Testing the cosmic distance duality relation using model-independent approach